Skip to content

YOLOv9 vs PP-YOLOE+: Advanced Object Detection Architectures Compared

In the rapidly evolving landscape of computer vision, selecting the right object detection model is critical for optimizing performance and resource utilization. This analysis compares YOLOv9, a groundbreaking architecture released in early 2024, against PP-YOLOE+, a strong contender from the PaddlePaddle ecosystem. While both models aim to solve real-time detection challenges, they employ vastly different strategies regarding information flow, gradient propagation, and training efficiency.

Performance Metrics Comparison

The following table highlights the performance differences between the two architectures on the COCO dataset. Notably, YOLOv9 demonstrates superior parameter efficiency, achieving higher Mean Average Precision (mAP) with significantly fewer computational resources than equivalent PP-YOLOE+ variants.

Modelsize
(pixels)
mAPval
50-95
Speed
CPU ONNX
(ms)
Speed
T4 TensorRT10
(ms)
params
(M)
FLOPs
(B)
YOLOv9t64038.3-2.32.07.7
YOLOv9s64046.8-3.547.126.4
YOLOv9m64051.4-6.4320.076.3
YOLOv9c64053.0-7.1625.3102.1
YOLOv9e64055.6-16.7757.3189.0
PP-YOLOE+t64039.9-2.844.8519.15
PP-YOLOE+s64043.7-2.627.9317.36
PP-YOLOE+m64049.8-5.5623.4349.91
PP-YOLOE+l64052.9-8.3652.2110.07
PP-YOLOE+x64054.7-14.398.42206.59

YOLOv9: Programmable Gradient Information

YOLOv9 was introduced by Chien-Yao Wang and Hong-Yuan Mark Liao from the Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, in February 2024. This model addresses a fundamental issue in deep learning known as the "information bottleneck," where data is lost as it passes through successive layers of a deep neural network.

Learn more about YOLOv9

Key Architectural Innovations

The core innovation of YOLOv9 lies in Programmable Gradient Information (PGI). In traditional deep networks, the loss function calculates the error at the final output layer, and gradients are backpropagated to update weights. As networks get deeper, the correlation between the input data and the final target can degrade. PGI introduces an auxiliary reversible branch that ensures reliable gradient generation for updating network weights, allowing the model to "remember" crucial input details throughout the training process.

To complement PGI, the authors developed the Generalized Efficient Layer Aggregation Network (GELAN). This architecture optimizes parameter utilization by allowing users to choose different computational blocks (like ResNets or CSPNets) without sacrificing efficiency.

Efficiency Breakthrough

The synergy between PGI and GELAN allows YOLOv9 to achieve comparable or better accuracy than competitors while using drastically fewer parameters. For example, the YOLOv9c achieves a 53.0% mAP with only 25.3 million parameters, whereas the PP-YOLOE+l requires 52.2 million parameters to reach a similar mAP of 52.9%.

For researchers interested in the theoretical underpinnings, the methodology is detailed in the YOLOv9 ArXiv paper. The implementation is fully integrated into the Ultralytics ecosystem, making it accessible via the GitHub repository.

PP-YOLOE+: Refined Anchor-Free Detection

PP-YOLOE+ is an enhanced version of PP-YOLOE, developed by the PaddlePaddle team at Baidu around 2022. It is an anchor-free model that focuses on balancing speed and accuracy using a unique set of optimization strategies.

Architecture and Methodology

PP-YOLOE+ builds upon the CSPRepResStage backbone and utilizes a Task Alignment Learning (TAL) strategy to improve label assignment. This approach ensures that the "best" anchors are selected based on a combination of classification score and localization quality, rather than spatial overlap alone.

The model uses an Efficient Task-aligned Head (ET-head) to decouple classification and localization tasks, a common practice in modern detectors to improve convergence. While PP-YOLOE+ was a state-of-the-art contender upon its release, it relies heavily on the PaddlePaddle framework. This can present a learning curve for developers accustomed to the PyTorch ecosystem which powers Ultralytics models. More details can be found in the PP-YOLOE paper and their GitHub documentation.

Comparative Analysis

When choosing between these models, several technical factors come into play beyond raw mAP scores.

1. Training Efficiency and Resources

YOLOv9's GELAN architecture is specifically designed to minimize computational cost. As shown in the benchmarking table, YOLOv9 models typically require fewer Floating Point Operations (FLOPs) than their PP-YOLOE+ counterparts to achieve similar accuracy. This directly translates to lower energy consumption and faster training times, which is a significant advantage when using cloud resources or on-premise GPUs.

2. Ecosystem and Ease of Use

The Ultralytics ecosystem offers a streamlined experience for developers. Models like YOLOv9 and YOLOv8 can be trained, validated, and deployed with a few lines of code.

from ultralytics import YOLO

# Load a pretrained YOLOv9 model
model = YOLO("yolov9c.pt")

# Train the model on your data
model.train(data="coco8.yaml", epochs=100, imgsz=640)

# Run inference on an image
results = model("path/to/image.jpg")

In contrast, deploying PP-YOLOE+ often requires navigating the PaddlePaddle ecosystem, which may involve converting datasets to specific formats or using separate tools for model export and inference. The Ultralytics Python package abstracts these complexities, providing a unified API for detection, segmentation, and classification.

3. Deployment and Versatility

Ultralytics models excel in deployment versatility. A trained YOLOv9 model can be easily exported to formats like ONNX, TensorRT, CoreML, and OpenVINO using the model.export() function. This seamless integration ensures that models can be deployed on everything from edge devices like Raspberry Pis to powerful cloud servers. While PP-YOLOE+ supports export, the workflow is generally more involved for users outside the Baidu infrastructure.

Looking Forward: The Next Generation

While YOLOv9 offers exceptional performance, the field of computer vision never stands still. Ultralytics continues to push boundaries with newer architectures.

Ultralytics YOLO26

For developers starting new projects in 2026, YOLO26 represents the pinnacle of efficiency. Released in January 2026, YOLO26 introduces an end-to-end NMS-free design, eliminating the need for Non-Maximum Suppression post-processing. This results in significantly faster inference speeds and simpler deployment pipelines compared to both YOLOv9 and PP-YOLOE+.

Learn more about YOLO26

YOLO26 also incorporates the MuSGD Optimizer, a hybrid optimization technique inspired by Large Language Model training, ensuring stable convergence even in complex vision tasks. For applications requiring strictly low-latency edge performance, YOLO26's removal of Distribution Focal Loss (DFL) and optimized CPU inference (up to 43% faster) make it a superior choice over previous generations.

Conclusion

Both YOLOv9 and PP-YOLOE+ are sophisticated architectures that have advanced the state of the art in object detection. PP-YOLOE+ remains a respectable model, particularly for those already invested in the PaddlePaddle framework. However, YOLOv9 distinguishes itself through superior parameter efficiency, the innovative PGI architecture, and the robust support of the Ultralytics ecosystem.

For most developers and researchers, the ease of use, extensive documentation, and seamless PyTorch integration make Ultralytics models the preferred choice. Furthermore, with the advent of YOLO26, users now have access to NMS-free detection and even greater inference speeds, ensuring that their computer vision applications remain future-proof.

Start Your Project Today

You can begin experimenting with these models immediately using the Ultralytics Platform, which simplifies dataset management and model training, allowing you to focus on building impactful solutions.


Comments