YOLOv5 vs YOLO11: A Comprehensive Technical Comparison
In the rapidly evolving landscape of computer vision, choosing the right object detection model is critical for project success. Two of the most significant milestones in this field are YOLOv5 and the recently released YOLO11. While YOLOv5 established a legendary standard for ease of use and speed, YOLO11 pushes the boundaries of accuracy and efficiency, leveraging years of research and development.
This guide provides a detailed technical analysis of these two architectures, helping developers, researchers, and engineers make informed decisions for their AI applications.
Ultralytics YOLOv5: The Reliable Workhorse
Released in 2020, YOLOv5 revolutionized the accessibility of object detection. It was the first "You Only Look Once" model implemented natively in PyTorch, making it incredibly easy for developers to train and deploy. Its balance of speed and accuracy made it the go-to choice for everything from industrial inspection to autonomous vehicles.
Technical Details:
- Authors: Glenn Jocher
- Organization:Ultralytics
- Date: 2020-06-26
- GitHub:https://github.com/ultralytics/yolov5
- Docs:https://docs.ultralytics.com/models/yolov5/
Key Features and Architecture
YOLOv5 utilizes an anchor-based architecture. It introduced a CSPDarknet backbone, which significantly improved gradient flow and reduced computational cost compared to previous iterations. The model employs a Path Aggregation Network (PANet) neck to boost information flow and integrates Mosaic data augmentation during training, a technique that has become a standard for improving model robustness against smaller objects.
Strengths
YOLOv5 is renowned for its stability and maturity. With years of community testing, the ecosystem of tutorials, third-party integrations, and deployment guides is vast. It is an excellent choice for legacy systems or edge devices where specific hardware optimizations for its architecture are already in place.
Ultralytics YOLO11: The State-of-the-Art Evolution
Launching in late 2024, YOLO11 represents the cutting edge of vision AI. It builds upon the lessons learned from YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 to deliver a model that is faster, more accurate, and more computationally efficient.
Technical Details:
- Authors: Glenn Jocher, Jing Qiu
- Organization:Ultralytics
- Date: 2024-09-27
- GitHub:https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics
- Docs:https://docs.ultralytics.com/models/yolo11/
Architecture and Key Features
YOLO11 introduces significant architectural refinements, including the C3k2 block and C2PSA (Cross-Stage Partial with Spatial Attention) modules. Unlike YOLOv5, YOLO11 utilizes an anchor-free detection head, which simplifies the training process by eliminating the need to manually calculate anchor boxes. This design shift enhances generalization and allows the model to adapt better to diverse datasets.
Unmatched Versatility
One of the defining characteristics of YOLO11 is its native support for multiple computer vision tasks within a single framework. While YOLOv5 primarily focused on detection (with later support for segmentation), YOLO11 was built from the ground up to handle:
- Object Detection
- Instance Segmentation
- Image Classification
- Pose Estimation
- Oriented Bounding Boxes (OBB)
This versatility allows developers to tackle complex robotics and analysis problems without switching frameworks.
Performance Comparison
The transition from YOLOv5 to YOLO11 yields substantial performance gains. The metrics demonstrate that YOLO11 offers a superior trade-off between speed and accuracy.
Accuracy vs. Efficiency
YOLO11 consistently achieves higher Mean Average Precision (mAP) on the COCO dataset compared to YOLOv5 models of similar size. For instance, the YOLO11m model surpasses the much larger YOLOv5x in accuracy (51.5 vs 50.7 mAP) while operating with a fraction of the parameters (20.1M vs 97.2M). This drastic reduction in model size translates to lower memory requirements during both training and inference, a critical factor for deploying on resource-constrained edge AI hardware.
Inference Speed
Thanks to optimized architectural choices, YOLO11 shines in CPU inference speeds. The YOLO11n model creates a new benchmark for real-time applications, clocking in at just 56.1ms on CPU with ONNX, significantly faster than its predecessor.
Memory Efficiency
Ultralytics YOLO11 models are designed for optimal memory usage. Compared to transformer-based detectors like RT-DETR, YOLO11 requires significantly less CUDA memory during training, making it accessible to developers with standard consumer GPUs.
| Model | size (pixels) | mAPval 50-95 | Speed CPU ONNX (ms) | Speed T4 TensorRT10 (ms) | params (M) | FLOPs (B) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YOLOv5n | 640 | 28.0 | 73.6 | 1.12 | 2.6 | 7.7 |
| YOLOv5s | 640 | 37.4 | 120.7 | 1.92 | 9.1 | 24.0 |
| YOLOv5m | 640 | 45.4 | 233.9 | 4.03 | 25.1 | 64.2 |
| YOLOv5l | 640 | 49.0 | 408.4 | 6.61 | 53.2 | 135.0 |
| YOLOv5x | 640 | 50.7 | 763.2 | 11.89 | 97.2 | 246.4 |
| YOLO11n | 640 | 39.5 | 56.1 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 6.5 |
| YOLO11s | 640 | 47.0 | 90.0 | 2.5 | 9.4 | 21.5 |
| YOLO11m | 640 | 51.5 | 183.2 | 4.7 | 20.1 | 68.0 |
| YOLO11l | 640 | 53.4 | 238.6 | 6.2 | 25.3 | 86.9 |
| YOLO11x | 640 | 54.7 | 462.8 | 11.3 | 56.9 | 194.9 |
Training and Developer Experience
Both models benefit from the comprehensive Ultralytics ecosystem, known for its "Ease of Use."
Seamless Integration
YOLO11 is integrated into the modern ultralytics Python package, which unifies all tasks under a simple API. This allows for training, validation, and deployment in just a few lines of code.
from ultralytics import YOLO
# Load a COCO-pretrained YOLO11n model
model = YOLO("yolo11n.pt")
# Train on a custom dataset
results = model.train(data="coco8.yaml", epochs=100, imgsz=640)
# Run inference on an image
results = model("path/to/image.jpg")
While YOLOv5 has its own dedicated repository, it can also be loaded easily via PyTorch Hub or utilized within the newer ecosystem for certain tasks. The robust documentation for both models ensures that whether you are performing hyperparameter tuning or exporting to OpenVINO, the process is streamlined.
Ecosystem Benefits
Choosing an Ultralytics model means gaining access to a well-maintained suite of tools. From integration with Comet for experiment tracking to seamless dataset management, the ecosystem supports the entire MLOps lifecycle. This active development ensures that security patches and performance improvements are regularly delivered.
Ideal Use Cases
When to Choose YOLOv5
- Legacy Hardware: If you have existing edge devices (like older Raspberry Pis) with pipelines specifically optimized for the YOLOv5 architecture.
- Established Workflows: For projects deep in maintenance mode where updating the core model architecture would incur significant refactoring costs.
- Specific GPU Optimizations: In rare cases where specific TensorRT engines are heavily tuned for YOLOv5's exact layer structure.
When to Choose YOLO11
- New Developments: For virtually all new projects, YOLO11 is the recommended starting point due to its superior accuracy-to-compute ratio.
- Real-Time CPU Applications: Applications running on standard processors, such as laptops or cloud instances, benefit immensely from YOLO11's CPU speed optimizations.
- Complex Tasks: Projects requiring instance segmentation or pose estimation alongside detection.
- High-Accuracy Requirements: Domains like medical imaging or satellite imagery analysis, where detecting small objects with high precision is paramount.
Conclusion
YOLOv5 remains a testament to efficient and accessible AI design, having powered countless innovations over the last few years. However, YOLO11 represents the future. With its advanced anchor-free architecture, superior mAP scores, and enhanced versatility, it provides developers with a more powerful toolset for solving modern computer vision challenges.
By adopting YOLO11, you not only get better performance but also future-proof your applications within the thriving Ultralytics ecosystem.
Explore Other Models
If you are interested in comparing these architectures with other leading models, explore our detailed comparisons: