YOLOv9 vs. YOLOv7: A Detailed Technical Comparison
When selecting a YOLO model for object detection, understanding the nuances between different versions is crucial. This page provides a detailed technical comparison between YOLOv7 and YOLOv9, two significant models in the YOLO series developed by researchers at the Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan. We will explore their architectural innovations, performance benchmarks, and suitability for various applications to help you make an informed decision for your computer vision projects.
YOLOv9: Programmable Gradient Information for Enhanced Learning
YOLOv9, introduced in February 2024, represents a significant advancement by tackling information loss in deep neural networks, a common problem that can degrade model performance.
Authors: Chien-Yao Wang and Hong-Yuan Mark Liao
Organization: Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan
Date: 2024-02-21
Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.13616
GitHub: https://github.com/WongKinYiu/yolov9
Docs: https://docs.ultralytics.com/models/yolov9/
Architecture and Key Features
YOLOv9 introduces novel concepts to improve information flow and learning efficiency, setting it apart from its predecessors.
- Programmable Gradient Information (PGI): This is the core innovation of YOLOv9. It addresses the information bottleneck problem in deep networks by generating reliable gradients through auxiliary reversible branches. This ensures that crucial information is preserved across all layers, leading to more effective model training and better final accuracy.
- Generalized Efficient Layer Aggregation Network (GELAN): YOLOv9 features a new network architecture that optimizes parameter utilization and computational efficiency. GELAN is a lightweight, gradient-path-planning-based architecture that builds upon the successes of designs like CSPNet, which was instrumental in models like YOLOv5.
Strengths
- Enhanced Accuracy: The combination of PGI and GELAN allows for superior feature extraction and higher mean Average Precision (mAP) scores compared to YOLOv7, particularly evident in the larger model variants.
- Improved Efficiency: YOLOv9 achieves better accuracy with fewer parameters and computations (FLOPs) than YOLOv7. For example, YOLOv9-C achieves a similar mAP to YOLOv7x with 66% fewer parameters and 46% fewer FLOPs.
- State-of-the-Art: Represents the latest innovations from the original YOLO authors, pushing the boundaries of what's possible in real-time object detection.
Weaknesses
- Computational Demand: While efficient for its accuracy, the advanced architecture, especially larger variants like YOLOv9-E, can still require significant computational resources for training and deployment.
- Newer Model: As a more recent release, community support and readily available deployment tutorials might be less extensive than for the well-established YOLOv7. However, the Ultralytics YOLOv9 implementation mitigates this by providing a streamlined, well-documented, and supported environment.
Use Cases
YOLOv9 is ideal for applications demanding the highest accuracy and efficiency, where detecting objects precisely is critical.
- Complex detection tasks in autonomous vehicles and robotics.
- Advanced security systems requiring precise detection of small or occluded objects.
- Applications in medical image analysis where high fidelity is non-negotiable.
YOLOv7: Optimized for Speed and Efficiency
YOLOv7, released in July 2022, was a landmark model that aimed to significantly optimize the trade-off between speed and accuracy for real-time inference.
Authors: Chien-Yao Wang, Alexey Bochkovskiy, and Hong-Yuan Mark Liao
Organization: Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan
Date: 2022-07-06
Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.02696
GitHub: https://github.com/WongKinYiu/yolov7
Docs: https://docs.ultralytics.com/models/yolov7/
Architecture and Key Features
YOLOv7 focused on optimizing the architecture and training process to make models faster and more accurate without increasing the inference cost.
- Extended Efficient Layer Aggregation Network (E-ELAN): This architectural block enhances the network's learning capability by allowing it to learn more diverse features, improving performance without disrupting the original gradient path.
- Model Scaling: YOLOv7 introduced compound scaling methods for model depth and width, allowing it to be optimized effectively for different model sizes and computational budgets.
- Trainable Bag-of-Freebies: This concept incorporates various optimization techniques during training, such as advanced data augmentation and label assignment strategies. These techniques improve accuracy without adding any computational overhead during inference.
Strengths
- High Inference Speed: YOLOv7 is highly optimized for speed and remains one of the fastest object detectors available, making it excellent for real-time applications on various hardware.
- Strong Performance: It achieves competitive mAP scores, making it a reliable and powerful choice for many standard object detection tasks.
- Established Model: Having been available for longer, YOLOv7 benefits from wider adoption, extensive community resources, and many proven deployment examples across different industries.
Weaknesses
- Lower Peak Accuracy: While fast, it may exhibit slightly lower peak accuracy compared to the newer YOLOv9 in complex scenarios with challenging objects.
- Anchor-Based: It relies on predefined anchor boxes, which can sometimes be less flexible than anchor-free approaches for detecting objects with unusual aspect ratios.
Use Cases
YOLOv7 is well-suited for applications where inference speed is the most critical factor.
- Real-time video analysis and surveillance on edge AI devices.
- High-throughput systems like quality control on a fast-moving production line.
- Rapid prototyping of object detection systems where quick deployment is essential.
Performance and Efficiency: A Head-to-Head Look
The primary difference between YOLOv9 and YOLOv7 lies in the trade-off between accuracy, model size, and computational cost. YOLOv9 pushes the efficiency frontier, delivering higher accuracy with fewer parameters and FLOPs. For instance, YOLOv9-M achieves the same 51.4% mAP as YOLOv7l but with 46% fewer parameters and 27% fewer FLOPs. This trend continues up the scale, where YOLOv9-E sets a new state-of-the-art with 55.6% mAP, surpassing all YOLOv7 variants.
This improved efficiency means that for a given accuracy target, YOLOv9 offers a smaller, faster, and more energy-efficient model.
| Model | size (pixels) |
mAPval 50-95 |
Speed CPU ONNX (ms) |
Speed T4 TensorRT10 (ms) |
params (M) |
FLOPs (B) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YOLOv9t | 640 | 38.3 | - | 2.3 | 2.0 | 7.7 |
| YOLOv9s | 640 | 46.8 | - | 3.54 | 7.1 | 26.4 |
| YOLOv9m | 640 | 51.4 | - | 6.43 | 20.0 | 76.3 |
| YOLOv9c | 640 | 53.0 | - | 7.16 | 25.3 | 102.1 |
| YOLOv9e | 640 | 55.6 | - | 16.77 | 57.3 | 189.0 |
| YOLOv7l | 640 | 51.4 | - | 6.84 | 36.9 | 104.7 |
| YOLOv7x | 640 | 53.1 | - | 11.57 | 71.3 | 189.9 |
Conclusion: Which Model Is Right for You?
Both YOLOv7 and YOLOv9 are powerful models, but they cater to slightly different priorities.
-
Choose YOLOv9 if your application requires the highest possible accuracy and efficiency. Its architectural advancements make it superior for complex scenes and resource-constrained deployments where you need the best performance from a smaller model.
-
Choose YOLOv7 if you need a battle-tested, extremely fast model for standard real-time applications and prefer to work with a more established architecture with vast community resources.
For developers and researchers looking for the best overall experience, we recommend using these models within the Ultralytics ecosystem. Newer models like Ultralytics YOLOv8 and YOLO11 not only offer competitive performance but also come with significant advantages:
- Ease of Use: A streamlined user experience with a simple Python API and extensive documentation.
- Well-Maintained Ecosystem: Active development, strong community support, and integration with tools like Ultralytics HUB for no-code training and deployment.
- Versatility: Support for multiple tasks beyond detection, including instance segmentation, pose estimation, and classification, all within a single framework.
- Training Efficiency: Efficient training processes with readily available pre-trained weights and lower memory requirements compared to many other model types.
Explore Other Models
For further comparisons, consider exploring other state-of-the-art models available in the Ultralytics documentation:
