PP-YOLOE+ vs. YOLOv9: A Comprehensive Comparison of Object Detection Architectures
Real-time object detection continues to evolve rapidly, with researchers constantly pushing the boundaries of accuracy, latency, and parameter efficiency. Two significant milestones in this journey are PP-YOLOE+, developed by the PaddlePaddle team at Baidu, and YOLOv9, created by the original YOLOv7 authors. This comparison explores the architectural innovations, performance metrics, and deployment realities of these two powerful models.
Model Metadata
PP-YOLOE+
Authors: PaddlePaddle Authors
Organization: Baidu
Date: 2022-04-02
Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.16250
GitHub: PaddleDetection Repository
Docs: Official PaddleDocs
YOLOv9
Authors: Chien-Yao Wang and Hong-Yuan Mark Liao
Organization: Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan
Date: 2024-02-21
Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.13616
GitHub: YOLOv9 Repository
Docs: Ultralytics YOLOv9 Docs
Performance Analysis
When comparing these models, developers typically look at the trade-off between mAP (mean Average Precision) and inference speed. The table below highlights that while PP-YOLOE+ was a state-of-the-art anchor-free detector in 2022, YOLOv9 (2024) utilizes newer architectural principles to achieve superior parameter efficiency.
| Model | size (pixels) | mAPval 50-95 | Speed CPU ONNX (ms) | Speed T4 TensorRT10 (ms) | params (M) | FLOPs (B) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP-YOLOE+t | 640 | 39.9 | - | 2.84 | 4.85 | 19.15 |
| PP-YOLOE+s | 640 | 43.7 | - | 2.62 | 7.93 | 17.36 |
| PP-YOLOE+m | 640 | 49.8 | - | 5.56 | 23.43 | 49.91 |
| PP-YOLOE+l | 640 | 52.9 | - | 8.36 | 52.2 | 110.07 |
| PP-YOLOE+x | 640 | 54.7 | - | 14.3 | 98.42 | 206.59 |
| YOLOv9t | 640 | 38.3 | - | 2.3 | 2.0 | 7.7 |
| YOLOv9s | 640 | 46.8 | - | 3.54 | 7.1 | 26.4 |
| YOLOv9m | 640 | 51.4 | - | 6.43 | 20.0 | 76.3 |
| YOLOv9c | 640 | 53.0 | - | 7.16 | 25.3 | 102.1 |
| YOLOv9e | 640 | 55.6 | - | 16.77 | 57.3 | 189.0 |
Notable takeaways include:
- Parameter Efficiency: YOLOv9t achieves competitive accuracy with less than half the parameters of PP-YOLOE+t (2.0M vs 4.85M), making it far more suitable for memory-constrained edge devices.
- Accuracy at Scale: For larger models, YOLOv9e surpasses PP-YOLOE+x in mAP (55.6% vs 54.7%) while utilizing significantly fewer parameters (57.3M vs 98.42M).
- Speed: YOLOv9 offers extremely competitive inference speeds on NVIDIA T4 GPUs, particularly for the smaller variants.
Architectural Differences
PP-YOLOE+: Refined Anchor-Free Detection
PP-YOLOE+ is an evolution of PP-YOLOv2, emphasizing an anchor-free paradigm. It employs a CSPResNet backbone and a simplified CSPPAN neck. Key features include:
- Task Alignment Learning (TAL): A label assignment strategy that dynamically selects positive samples based on a combination of classification and localization scores.
- ET-Head: An Efficient Task-aligned Head designed to balance speed and accuracy.
- Dynamic Matching: Improves convergence speed during training compared to static anchor assignment.
YOLOv9: Programmable Gradient Information
YOLOv9 introduces fundamental changes to how deep networks handle data flow. It addresses the "information bottleneck" problem where data is lost as it passes through deep layers.
- GELAN Architecture: The Generalized Efficient Layer Aggregation Network combines the best of CSPNet and ELAN to maximize parameter utilization.
- PGI (Programmable Gradient Information): This novel concept uses an auxiliary reversible branch to generate reliable gradients for the main branch, ensuring that deep features retain critical information about the input image.
- Auxiliary Supervision: Similar to techniques seen in segmentation models, YOLOv9 uses auxiliary heads during training to boost performance without affecting inference speed (as these heads are removed during deployment).
Why Gradient Information Matters
In very deep neural networks, the original input data can be "forgotten" by the time features reach the final layers. YOLOv9's PGI ensures that the model retains a complete understanding of the object, which is particularly helpful for detecting small or occluded objects in complex scenes.
Ecosystem and Ease of Use
The most significant difference for developers lies in the ecosystem and workflow.
The Ultralytics Advantage
YOLOv9 is fully integrated into the Ultralytics ecosystem. This means you can train, validate, and deploy the model using the same simple API used for YOLO11 and YOLO26.
Key Benefits:
- Unified API: Switch between tasks like Object Detection and Pose Estimation by simply changing the model weight file.
- Automated MLOps: Seamless integration with the Ultralytics Platform allows for cloud training, dataset management, and one-click model deployment.
- Memory Efficiency: Ultralytics training loops are highly optimized, often requiring less VRAM than competing frameworks. This is a crucial advantage over many transformer-based models which require massive compute resources.
- Export Versatility: Native support for exporting to ONNX, OpenVINO, CoreML, and TensorRT ensures your model runs anywhere.
from ultralytics import YOLO
# Load a pretrained YOLOv9c model
model = YOLO("yolov9c.pt")
# Train the model on the COCO8 dataset
results = model.train(data="coco8.yaml", epochs=100, imgsz=640)
# Export to TensorRT for maximum GPU speed
model.export(format="engine")
PP-YOLOE+ Workflow
PP-YOLOE+ relies on the PaddlePaddle framework. While powerful, it requires adopting a specific ecosystem that is distinct from the PyTorch-centric workflow many researchers prefer. Setting it up often involves cloning the PaddleDetection repository and managing configuration files manually, which can present a steeper learning curve compared to the pip install ultralytics experience.
Use Cases and Recommendations
When to Stick with PP-YOLOE+
- Legacy Integration: If your production environment is already built on Baidu's PaddlePaddle infrastructure.
- Specific Hardware: If you are deploying to hardware that has specialized optimization solely for Paddle Lite.
When to Choose Ultralytics YOLO Models
For the vast majority of new projects, YOLOv9 or the newer YOLO26 are the recommended choices.
- Research & Development: The PGI architecture in YOLOv9 provides a rich playground for researchers studying gradient flow.
- Commercial Deployment: The robust export options in the Ultralytics ecosystem make it easy to move from a PyTorch prototype to a C++ production app using TensorRT or OpenVINO.
- Edge Computing: With superior parameter efficiency (mAP per FLOP), Ultralytics models are ideal for battery-powered devices like drones or smart cameras.
Looking Ahead: The Power of YOLO26
While YOLOv9 is an excellent model, the field has advanced further with the release of YOLO26. If you are starting a new project today, YOLO26 offers several critical advantages over both PP-YOLOE+ and YOLOv9.
YOLO26 represents the bleeding edge of computer vision efficiency:
- End-to-End NMS-Free: Unlike PP-YOLOE+ and YOLOv9 which require Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS) post-processing, YOLO26 is natively NMS-free. This reduces latency variability and simplifies deployment pipelines significantly.
- MuSGD Optimizer: Inspired by innovations in LLM training (like Moonshot AI's Kimi K2), YOLO26 utilizes the MuSGD optimizer for faster convergence and more stable training runs.
- Enhanced Small Object Detection: With ProgLoss + STAL, YOLO26 excels at detecting small objects, a traditional weak point for many real-time detectors.
- CPU Speed: With the removal of Distribution Focal Loss (DFL) and other optimizations, YOLO26 achieves up to 43% faster CPU inference, making it the premier choice for serverless environments or edge devices without dedicated NPUs.
Summary
Both PP-YOLOE+ and YOLOv9 are landmarks in object detection history. PP-YOLOE+ refined the anchor-free approach, while YOLOv9 introduced deep supervision concepts via PGI. However, for developers seeking the best balance of accuracy, ease of use, and future-proof deployment, the Ultralytics ecosystem—spearheaded by YOLOv9 and the revolutionary YOLO26—provides the most robust solution.
Explore More
Interested in other architectures? Check out our comparisons for RT-DETR (transformer-based) or YOLO11 to find the perfect fit for your application.