Skip to content

PP-YOLOE+ vs YOLO11: A Technical Comparison for Object Detection

Choosing the optimal object detection model is a critical decision that balances accuracy, speed, and deployment constraints. This page provides a comprehensive technical comparison between PP-YOLOE+, a powerful model from Baidu's PaddlePaddle ecosystem, and Ultralytics YOLO11, the latest state-of-the-art model from Ultralytics. While both models deliver strong performance, YOLO11 stands out for its superior efficiency, versatility, and user-friendly ecosystem, making it the recommended choice for a wide range of modern computer vision applications.

PP-YOLOE+: High Accuracy within the PaddlePaddle Ecosystem

PP-YOLOE+ (Practical PaddlePaddle You Only Look One-level Efficient Plus) is an object detection model developed by Baidu as part of their PaddleDetection suite. Released in 2022, it focuses on achieving high accuracy while maintaining reasonable efficiency, particularly within the PaddlePaddle deep learning framework.

Technical Details:

Architecture and Key Features

PP-YOLOE+ is an anchor-free, single-stage detector that builds upon the YOLO architecture with several key enhancements. Its design aims to improve the trade-off between speed and accuracy.

  • Anchor-Free Design: By eliminating predefined anchor boxes, the model simplifies the detection pipeline and reduces the complexity of hyperparameter tuning.
  • Efficient Components: The architecture often employs backbones like CSPRepResNet and a Path Aggregation Network (PAN) neck for effective feature fusion.
  • Task Alignment Learning (TAL): It uses a specialized loss function and label assignment strategy to better align classification and localization tasks, which helps improve overall detection accuracy.
  • PaddlePaddle Integration: The model is deeply integrated and optimized for the PaddlePaddle framework, making it a natural choice for developers already working within that ecosystem.

Strengths and Weaknesses

Strengths:

  • High Accuracy: PP-YOLOE+ models, especially the larger variants, achieve competitive mAP scores on standard benchmarks like the COCO dataset.
  • Efficient Anchor-Free Head: The design of the detection head is streamlined for efficiency.

Weaknesses:

  • Framework Dependency: Its primary optimization for PaddlePaddle can be a limitation for the vast community of developers using PyTorch, requiring framework conversion and potentially losing performance optimizations.
  • Higher Resource Usage: As shown in the performance table, PP-YOLOE+ models generally have a higher parameter count and more FLOPs compared to YOLO11 models at similar accuracy levels, leading to greater computational cost.
  • Limited Versatility: PP-YOLOE+ is primarily focused on object detection, whereas other modern frameworks offer integrated support for a wider range of vision tasks.

Learn more about PP-YOLOE+

Ultralytics YOLO11: State-of-the-Art Performance and Versatility

Ultralytics YOLO11 is the latest evolution in the YOLO series, developed by Glenn Jocher and Jing Qiu at Ultralytics. Released in 2024, it sets a new standard for real-time object detection by delivering an exceptional balance of speed, accuracy, and efficiency. It is designed from the ground up to be versatile, easy to use, and deployable across a wide range of hardware.

Technical Details:

Architecture and Key Features

YOLO11 builds on the successful foundation of its predecessors like YOLOv8 with a refined architecture that enhances feature extraction and processing speed.

  • Optimized Architecture: YOLO11 features a streamlined network design that achieves higher accuracy with a significantly lower parameter count and fewer FLOPs than competitors like PP-YOLOE+. This efficiency is crucial for real-time inference and deployment on resource-constrained edge devices.
  • Versatility: A key advantage of YOLO11 is its native support for multiple computer vision tasks within a single, unified framework. This includes object detection, instance segmentation, image classification, pose estimation, and oriented bounding boxes (OBB).
  • Ease of Use: YOLO11 is part of a well-maintained Ultralytics ecosystem that prioritizes user experience. It offers a simple Python API and CLI, comprehensive documentation, and readily available pre-trained weights.
  • Training Efficiency: The model is designed for faster training times and requires less memory, making state-of-the-art AI more accessible to developers and researchers. This contrasts with other model types like transformers, which are often slower to train and demand more computational resources.
  • Active Ecosystem: Users benefit from active development, strong community support via GitHub and Discord, and seamless integration with tools like Ultralytics HUB for end-to-end MLOps.

Strengths and Weaknesses

Strengths:

  • Superior Performance Balance: Offers an excellent trade-off between speed and accuracy across all model sizes.
  • Computational Efficiency: Lower parameter counts and FLOPs lead to faster inference and reduced hardware requirements.
  • Multi-Task Support: Unmatched versatility with built-in support for five major vision tasks.
  • User-Friendly Ecosystem: Simple to install, train, and deploy, backed by extensive resources and a strong community.
  • Deployment Flexibility: Optimized for a wide range of hardware, from Raspberry Pi to cloud servers.

Weaknesses:

  • As a one-stage detector, it may face challenges with extremely small objects compared to some specialized two-stage detectors.
  • The largest models (e.g., YOLO11x) still require substantial computational power for real-time performance, though less than comparable competitor models.

Learn more about YOLO11

Performance Analysis: PP-YOLOE+ vs. YOLO11

The performance benchmarks on the COCO dataset clearly illustrate the advantages of YOLO11.

Model size
(pixels)
mAPval
50-95
Speed
CPU ONNX
(ms)
Speed
T4 TensorRT10
(ms)
params
(M)
FLOPs
(B)
PP-YOLOE+t 640 39.9 - 2.84 4.85 19.15
PP-YOLOE+s 640 43.7 - 2.62 7.93 17.36
PP-YOLOE+m 640 49.8 - 5.56 23.43 49.91
PP-YOLOE+l 640 52.9 - 8.36 52.2 110.07
PP-YOLOE+x 640 54.7 - 14.3 98.42 206.59
YOLO11n 640 39.5 56.1 1.5 2.6 6.5
YOLO11s 640 47.0 90.0 2.5 9.4 21.5
YOLO11m 640 51.5 183.2 4.7 20.1 68.0
YOLO11l 640 53.4 238.6 6.2 25.3 86.9
YOLO11x 640 54.7 462.8 11.3 56.9 194.9
  • Accuracy vs. Efficiency: At the high end, YOLO11x matches the 54.7 mAP of PP-YOLOE+x but does so with only 58% of the parameters (56.9M vs. 98.42M) and fewer FLOPs. This trend continues down the scale; for example, YOLO11l surpasses PP-YOLOE+l in accuracy (53.4 vs. 52.9 mAP) with less than half the parameters.
  • Inference Speed: YOLO11 models consistently demonstrate faster inference speeds on GPU. For instance, YOLO11l is over 25% faster than PP-YOLOE+l on a T4 GPU, while YOLO11x is over 20% faster than PP-YOLOE+x. This speed advantage is critical for applications requiring real-time processing, such as autonomous vehicles and robotics.
  • Scalability: YOLO11 provides a much more efficient scaling curve. Developers can achieve high accuracy without the massive computational overhead associated with PP-YOLOE+ larger models, making advanced AI more accessible.

Conclusion and Recommendation

While PP-YOLOE+ is a capable object detector, its strengths are most pronounced for users already committed to the Baidu PaddlePaddle ecosystem.

For the vast majority of developers, researchers, and businesses, Ultralytics YOLO11 is the clear and superior choice. It offers a state-of-the-art combination of accuracy and efficiency, significantly reducing computational costs and enabling deployment on a wider variety of hardware. Its unmatched versatility across five different vision tasks, coupled with an easy-to-use and well-supported ecosystem, empowers users to build more complex and powerful AI solutions with less effort.

Whether you are developing for the edge or the cloud, YOLO11 provides the performance, flexibility, and accessibility needed to push the boundaries of what's possible in computer vision.

Other Models to Consider

If you are exploring other architectures, you may also be interested in comparisons with models like YOLOv10, YOLOv9, and RT-DETR, which are also supported within the Ultralytics framework.



📅 Created 1 year ago ✏️ Updated 1 month ago

Comments