Skip to content

YOLO11 vs. DAMO-YOLO: A Technical Comparison

This page provides a detailed technical comparison between two state-of-the-art object detection models: Ultralytics YOLO11 and DAMO-YOLO. We will analyze their architectural differences, performance metrics, and ideal applications to help you make an informed decision for your computer vision projects. While both models are designed for high-performance object detection, they employ distinct approaches and exhibit different strengths, with YOLO11 offering superior versatility and a more robust ecosystem for real-world deployment.

Ultralytics YOLO11

Authors: Glenn Jocher, Jing Qiu
Organization: Ultralytics
Date: 2024-09-27
GitHub: https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics
Docs: https://docs.ultralytics.com/models/yolo11/

Ultralytics YOLO11 is the latest advancement in the renowned YOLO (You Only Look Once) series, celebrated for its rapid and effective object detection capabilities. YOLO11 enhances prior YOLO iterations with architectural refinements aimed at boosting both precision and speed. It retains the one-stage detection method, processing images in a single pass for real-time performance.

A key advantage of YOLO11 is its versatility. Unlike DAMO-YOLO, which primarily focuses on detection, YOLO11 is a multi-task framework supporting object detection, instance segmentation, image classification, and pose estimation. This makes it a comprehensive solution for complex computer vision pipelines.

Architecture and Key Features

YOLO11 focuses on balancing model size and accuracy through architectural improvements. These include refined feature extraction layers for richer feature capture and a streamlined network to cut computational costs, leading to faster and more parameter-efficient models. Its adaptable design allows deployment on a wide range of hardware, from edge devices like the NVIDIA Jetson to powerful cloud servers.

Crucially, YOLO11 benefits immensely from the well-maintained Ultralytics ecosystem. This provides a significant advantage for developers and researchers:

  • Ease of Use: A simple Python API, clear CLI, and extensive documentation make getting started straightforward.
  • Integrated Workflow: Seamless integration with Ultralytics HUB simplifies dataset management, training, and deployment, streamlining the entire MLOps lifecycle.
  • Training Efficiency: Efficient training processes, readily available pre-trained weights on datasets like COCO, and typically lower memory requirements compared to other complex architectures.
  • Active Development: Frequent updates, strong community support via GitHub and Discord, and numerous integrations with tools like TensorRT and OpenVINO.

Learn more about YOLO11

DAMO-YOLO

Authors: Xianzhe Xu, Yiqi Jiang, Weihua Chen, Yilun Huang, Yuan Zhang, and Xiuyu Sun
Organization: Alibaba Group
Date: 2022-11-23
Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.15444v2
GitHub: https://github.com/tinyvision/DAMO-YOLO
Docs: https://github.com/tinyvision/DAMO-YOLO/blob/master/README.md

DAMO-YOLO is an object detection model developed by the Alibaba Group that introduces several novel techniques to achieve a strong balance between speed and accuracy. It is part of the YOLO family but incorporates unique architectural components derived from advanced research concepts.

Architecture and Key Features

DAMO-YOLO's architecture is built on several key innovations:

  • MAE-NAS Backbone: It uses a Neural Architecture Search (NAS) approach to find an optimal backbone structure, resulting in efficient feature extraction.
  • Efficient RepGFPN Neck: It employs a generalized feature pyramid network with re-parameterization to enhance feature fusion across different scales effectively.
  • ZeroHead: The model uses a lightweight, decoupled head that separates classification and regression tasks with minimal overhead.
  • AlignedOTA Label Assignment: It introduces an improved label assignment strategy to better align classification and regression targets during training, which helps boost accuracy.

While these features make DAMO-YOLO a powerful detector, its primary focus remains on object detection. It lacks the built-in support for other vision tasks like segmentation or pose estimation that YOLO11 provides. Furthermore, its ecosystem is less comprehensive, with fewer official tutorials, integrations, and a smaller community compared to Ultralytics YOLO.

Learn more about DAMO-YOLO

Performance and Benchmarks: A Head-to-Head Look

The performance of both models on the COCO val2017 dataset reveals key differences. YOLO11 consistently demonstrates superior accuracy across comparable model sizes.

Model size
(pixels)		 mAPval
50-95		 Speed
CPU ONNX
(ms)		 Speed
T4 TensorRT10
(ms)		 params
(M)		 FLOPs
(B)
YOLO11n 640 39.5 56.1 1.5 2.6 6.5
YOLO11s 640 47.0 90.0 2.5 9.4 21.5
YOLO11m 640 51.5 183.2 4.7 20.1 68.0
YOLO11l 640 53.4 238.6 6.2 25.3 86.9
YOLO11x 640 54.7 462.8 11.3 56.9 194.9
DAMO-YOLOt 640 42.0 - 2.32 8.5 18.1
DAMO-YOLOs 640 46.0 - 3.45 16.3 37.8
DAMO-YOLOm 640 49.2 - 5.09 28.2 61.8
DAMO-YOLOl 640 50.8 - 7.18 42.1 97.3

From the table, we can draw several conclusions:

  • Accuracy: YOLO11 models consistently achieve higher mAP scores than their DAMO-YOLO counterparts. For instance, YOLO11m reaches 51.5 mAP, outperforming DAMO-YOLOm's 49.2 mAP. The largest model, YOLO11x, achieves a state-of-the-art 54.7 mAP.
  • Efficiency: YOLO11 models are more parameter-efficient. YOLO11m achieves its superior accuracy with only 20.1M parameters, compared to 28.2M for DAMO-YOLOm.
  • Inference Speed: YOLO11n is the fastest model on both CPU and GPU, making it ideal for highly constrained edge computing scenarios. Notably, Ultralytics provides transparent CPU benchmarks, a critical metric for many real-world applications that DAMO-YOLO's official results omit.

Key Differentiators and Use Cases

When to Choose Ultralytics YOLO11

YOLO11 is the ideal choice for projects that require:

  • Multi-Task Capabilities: If your application needs more than just object detection, such as instance segmentation or pose estimation, YOLO11 provides a unified and efficient framework.
  • Ease of Use and Rapid Development: The comprehensive documentation, simple API, and integrated Ultralytics HUB platform significantly accelerate development and deployment.
  • Deployment Flexibility: With strong performance on both CPU and GPU and a wide range of model sizes, YOLO11 can be deployed anywhere from a Raspberry Pi to a cloud server.
  • Robust Support and Maintenance: The active development and large community ensure that the framework remains up-to-date, reliable, and well-supported.

When to Consider DAMO-YOLO

DAMO-YOLO could be considered for:

  • Academic Research: Its novel architectural components like RepGFPN and AlignedOTA make it an interesting model for researchers exploring new object detection techniques.
  • GPU-Specific Deployments: For applications that are guaranteed to run on GPUs and only require object detection, DAMO-YOLO offers competitive inference speeds.

Conclusion

While DAMO-YOLO presents interesting academic innovations for object detection, Ultralytics YOLO11 stands out as the superior choice for the vast majority of real-world applications. Its higher accuracy, better performance balance, and unmatched versatility make it a more powerful and practical tool.

The key advantage of YOLO11 lies not just in its state-of-the-art performance but in the robust, user-friendly, and well-maintained ecosystem that surrounds it. This combination empowers developers and researchers to build and deploy advanced computer vision solutions faster and more effectively. For projects that demand reliability, scalability, and a comprehensive feature set, YOLO11 is the clear winner.

Explore Other Model Comparisons

If you're interested in how these models stack up against others, check out our other comparison pages:



📅 Created 1 year ago ✏️ Updated 1 month ago
glenn-jocher

Comments