YOLO11 vs. YOLOv5: A Technical Deep Dive into Evolution
In the rapidly evolving landscape of computer vision, choosing the right object detection model is critical for project success. Two significant milestones in this journey are YOLOv5, the model that democratized vision AI with its usability, and YOLO11, a cutting-edge evolution pushing the boundaries of accuracy and efficiency. This comparison explores their architectural differences, performance metrics, and ideal use cases to help developers make informed decisions.
Model Overview
Ultralytics YOLO11
Released in September 2024, YOLO11 represents a significant leap forward in the YOLO series. Built by the team at Ultralytics, it refines the architecture to deliver superior feature extraction and processing speed. It is designed to be versatile, supporting tasks ranging from object detection to instance segmentation and pose estimation.
- Authors: Glenn Jocher and Jing Qiu
- Organization:Ultralytics
- Date: 2024-09-27
- GitHub:Ultralytics Repository
- Docs:YOLO11 Documentation
Ultralytics YOLOv5
YOLOv5, released in 2020, is perhaps the most iconic model in the series due to its profound impact on accessibility. It introduced a streamlined Pythonic experience that made training and deploying object detection models accessible to a broader audience. It remains a robust and reliable choice for many legacy systems and production environments.
- Authors: Glenn Jocher
- Organization:Ultralytics
- Date: 2020-06-26
- GitHub:YOLOv5 Repository
- Docs:YOLOv5 Documentation
Latest Technology
While YOLO11 offers significant improvements, the most recent advancement in the series is YOLO26. Released in January 2026, YOLO26 introduces an end-to-end NMS-free design, removing the need for post-processing and boosting inference speed by up to 43% on CPUs. It features the MuSGD optimizer for stable training and is the recommended model for all new projects.
Technical Comparison
Architecture and Design
The architectural evolution from YOLOv5 to YOLO11 highlights a shift towards maximizing parameter efficiency and feature representation.
YOLOv5 utilizes a backbone based on CSPDarknet53. Its design heavily relies on anchor-based detection, where the model predicts offsets from predefined anchor boxes. While effective, this approach introduces hyperparameters that need careful tuning for specific datasets. The model uses a Path Aggregation Network (PANet) neck to boost information flow.
YOLO11 adopts a more modern, anchor-free approach in its later iterations (following the trend set by YOLOv8), simplifying the training pipeline. It features an enhanced backbone and neck architecture designed for better feature extraction. This allows YOLO11 to capture more intricate patterns and details, which is crucial for complex tasks like oriented object detection (OBB) and segmentation. The design focuses on reducing parameter count while increasing mean Average Precision (mAP), achieving a better trade-off between speed and accuracy.
Performance Metrics
When comparing performance, YOLO11 consistently outperforms YOLOv5 across all model sizes, offering higher accuracy with fewer parameters.
| Model | size (pixels) | mAPval 50-95 | Speed CPU ONNX (ms) | Speed T4 TensorRT10 (ms) | params (M) | FLOPs (B) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YOLO11n | 640 | 39.5 | 56.1 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 6.5 |
| YOLO11s | 640 | 47.0 | 90.0 | 2.5 | 9.4 | 21.5 |
| YOLO11m | 640 | 51.5 | 183.2 | 4.7 | 20.1 | 68.0 |
| YOLO11l | 640 | 53.4 | 238.6 | 6.2 | 25.3 | 86.9 |
| YOLO11x | 640 | 54.7 | 462.8 | 11.3 | 56.9 | 194.9 |
| YOLOv5n | 640 | 28.0 | 73.6 | 1.12 | 2.6 | 7.7 |
| YOLOv5s | 640 | 37.4 | 120.7 | 1.92 | 9.1 | 24.0 |
| YOLOv5m | 640 | 45.4 | 233.9 | 4.03 | 25.1 | 64.2 |
| YOLOv5l | 640 | 49.0 | 408.4 | 6.61 | 53.2 | 135.0 |
| YOLOv5x | 640 | 50.7 | 763.2 | 11.89 | 97.2 | 246.4 |
Key Takeaways:
- Accuracy: YOLO11n achieves a 39.5 mAP compared to YOLOv5n's 28.0 mAP, a massive improvement for the nano model class. This trend holds for larger models, with YOLO11x reaching 54.7 mAP versus YOLOv5x's 50.7 mAP.
- Efficiency: YOLO11l uses approximately 52% fewer parameters (25.3M vs 53.2M) and 35% fewer FLOPs than YOLOv5l while achieving higher accuracy. This demonstrates the superior architectural efficiency of the newer model.
- Speed: On CPU inference (ONNX), YOLO11 is significantly faster, making it better suited for deployment on edge devices like the Raspberry Pi without hardware acceleration.
Versatility and Supported Tasks
While YOLOv5 was primarily designed for object detection, support for instance segmentation and classification was added in later updates (v7.0). However, the architecture was not natively built for these tasks from the ground up in the same way modern iterations are.
YOLO11 is inherently multi-task capable. It natively supports:
- Object Detection: Standard bounding box detection.
- Instance Segmentation: Pixel-level object masking.
- Pose Estimation: Detecting keypoints (e.g., human joints).
- Oriented Object Detection (OBB): Handling rotated objects, essential for aerial imagery.
- Image Classification: assigning a class label to an entire image.
This versatility allows developers to use a single unified framework for diverse computer vision applications, simplifying the development stack.
Use Cases and Applications
When to Choose YOLO11
YOLO11 is the preferred choice for most new deployments due to its balance of speed and high accuracy.
- Edge AI on Limited Hardware: With its optimized CPU speeds and lower parameter count, YOLO11 excels in environments with constrained resources, such as embedded systems or mobile apps using TFLite.
- Complex Scenarios: The improved feature extraction makes it superior for detecting small objects or working in cluttered environments, such as retail shelf monitoring or crowded surveillance footage.
- Multi-Task Requirements: Projects needing simultaneous detection, segmentation, and tracking benefit from YOLO11's native multi-task support without needing separate models.
When to Stick with YOLOv5
Despite being an older model, YOLOv5 remains relevant in specific contexts.
- Legacy Systems: Organizations with established pipelines built around the YOLOv5 codebase may find it costly to migrate. YOLOv5 is stable, well-understood, and continues to receive maintenance updates.
- Specific Hardware Optimization: Some older hardware accelerators may have specific optimizations or verified support for the specific layer structures found in YOLOv5 (e.g., specific CSP bottlenecks).
- Educational Value: Its simpler architecture and extensive community tutorials make it an excellent starting point for students learning the fundamentals of convolutional neural networks.
Ecosystem and Ease of Use
Both models benefit from the robust Ultralytics ecosystem, known for its developer-friendly tools.
Streamlined API: Both models can be loaded, trained, and deployed with just a few lines of Python code using the
ultralyticspackage.from ultralytics import YOLO # Load a model model = YOLO("yolo11n.pt") # or 'yolov5nu.pt' # Train the model model.train(data="coco8.yaml", epochs=100)Memory Efficiency: Unlike heavy transformer-based models that demand massive GPU VRAM, Ultralytics models are optimized for lower memory footprints during training, making them accessible on consumer-grade hardware.
- Deployment Options: Both models support seamless export to formats like ONNX, TensorRT, CoreML, and OpenVINO, ensuring your model runs anywhere from a cloud server to an iPhone.
Ultralytics Platform
To further simplify the lifecycle of your AI projects, Ultralytics offers the Ultralytics Platform (formerly HUB). This SaaS tool provides end-to-end support for data management, auto-annotation, and cloud training, streamlining the workflow from concept to deployment.
Conclusion
The transition from YOLOv5 to YOLO11 illustrates the rapid pace of innovation in AI. YOLOv5 laid the groundwork for accessible, high-performance object detection, creating a standard for usability. YOLO11 builds upon this legacy, introducing architectural refinements that drastically reduce model size while boosting accuracy and speed.
For developers starting new projects, YOLO11 (or the newer YOLO26) is the clear recommendation, offering state-of-the-art performance and versatility. However, YOLOv5 remains a trusted and capable tool for existing workflows and specific niche applications.
Summary
- YOLO11: Best for new projects, edge deployment, high accuracy needs, and multi-task applications (Seg, Pose, OBB).
- YOLOv5: Best for maintaining legacy systems, educational purposes, and environments with specific older hardware constraints.
Explore other models in the Ultralytics family, such as YOLOv8 for a proven middle-ground, or YOLOv9 for research-focused architectures involving Programmable Gradient Information (PGI).