EfficientDet vs YOLOv10: Technical Comparison

Choosing the right object detection model is crucial for the success of computer vision projects. This page offers a detailed technical comparison between two prominent models: EfficientDet and Ultralytics YOLOv10. We will explore their architectures, performance metrics, and use cases to help you decide which model best fits your needs, highlighting the advantages of YOLOv10 within the Ultralytics ecosystem.

EfficientDet: Accuracy and Scalability

EfficientDet, developed by Google Research, focuses on achieving high accuracy and scalability in object detection. Introduced in late 2019, it leverages architectural innovations like the EfficientNet backbone and BiFPN feature fusion network.

Technical Details:

• Authors: Mingxing Tan, Ruoming Pang, and Quoc V. Le
• Organization: Google
• Date: 2019-11-20
• Arxiv Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.09070
• GitHub Link: https://github.com/google/automl/tree/master/efficientdet
• Docs Link: https://github.com/google/automl/tree/master/efficientdet#readme

Architecture and Key Features

EfficientDet employs EfficientNet as its backbone for feature extraction and introduces the Bi-directional Feature Pyramid Network (BiFPN) for effective multi-scale feature fusion. A key aspect is its compound scaling method, which uniformly scales the resolution, depth, and width for all backbone, feature network, and box/class prediction networks simultaneously. This allows for a family of models (D0-D7) balancing accuracy and computational cost.

Performance Metrics

EfficientDet models, particularly the larger variants (D5-D7), achieve high mean Average Precision (mAP) on benchmarks like COCO. However, this accuracy often comes at the cost of increased latency and computational requirements, as seen in the performance table below.

Strengths and Weaknesses

Strengths:

• High mAP: Achieves high detection accuracy, especially suitable for tasks where precision is critical.
• Scalability: Offers a range of models (D0-D7) allowing users to choose based on resource constraints.
• Effective Feature Fusion: BiFPN efficiently fuses features across different scales.

Weaknesses:

• Inference Speed: Generally slower inference speeds compared to YOLOv10, particularly noticeable in real-time applications.
• Computational Cost: Higher computational demands (FLOPs) and potentially higher memory usage during training and inference, especially for larger models.
• Complexity: The architecture and scaling mechanisms can be more complex to understand and potentially harder to integrate compared to the streamlined approach of Ultralytics YOLO models.
• Limited Versatility: Primarily focused on object detection, lacking the built-in support for other tasks like segmentation or pose estimation found in models like YOLOv10 (when used within the Ultralytics framework).

Learn more about EfficientDet

YOLOv10: Optimized for Real-Time Efficiency

YOLOv10, introduced in May 2024 by researchers from Tsinghua University, represents a significant advancement in the YOLO series, focusing on achieving state-of-the-art real-time, end-to-end object detection performance. It is designed for high efficiency and speed, making it ideal for applications where low latency is critical.

Technical Details:

• Authors: Ao Wang, Hui Chen, Lihao Liu, et al.
• Organization: Tsinghua University
• Date: 2024-05-23
• Arxiv Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14458
• GitHub Link: https://github.com/THU-MIG/yolov10
• Docs Link: https://docs.ultralytics.com/models/yolov10/

Architecture and Key Features

YOLOv10 (arXiv, GitHub) introduces several key innovations for efficiency and accuracy. It utilizes consistent dual assignments for NMS-free training, eliminating the Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS) post-processing step, which reduces inference latency and simplifies deployment. Its holistic efficiency-accuracy driven design optimizes components like the classification head and downsampling layers to minimize computational redundancy and enhance model capability.

Performance Metrics

YOLOv10 excels in providing a superior balance between speed and accuracy. As shown in the table, even smaller YOLOv10 variants achieve competitive mAP scores with significantly lower latency compared to EfficientDet models. YOLOv10 models generally have fewer parameters and lower FLOPs compared to EfficientDet models of similar accuracy.

Strengths and Weaknesses

Strengths:

• Exceptional Speed and Efficiency: Highly optimized for real-time inference, crucial for low-latency systems.
• NMS-Free Inference: Simplifies deployment pipelines and reduces end-to-end latency.
• Performance Balance: Offers an excellent trade-off between speed and accuracy across various model sizes (n, s, m, b, l, x).
• Ease of Use: Seamlessly integrated into the Ultralytics ecosystem, benefiting from a simple Python API, extensive documentation, and straightforward workflows for training, validation, and export.
• Well-Maintained Ecosystem: Benefits from active development, strong community support, frequent updates, and numerous resources provided by Ultralytics, including integration with Ultralytics HUB.
• Memory Efficiency: Typically requires less memory for training and inference compared to more complex architectures.
• Training Efficiency: Efficient training process with readily available pre-trained weights simplifies custom dataset training.

Weaknesses:

• Peak Accuracy: While highly accurate, the largest EfficientDet models (e.g., D7) might achieve slightly higher peak mAP in scenarios where speed is not a constraint.

Learn more about YOLOv10

Performance Comparison: EfficientDet vs YOLOv10

The table below provides a quantitative comparison of various EfficientDet and YOLOv10 model variants based on COCO dataset performance metrics.

Analysis of the table clearly shows YOLOv10's advantage in speed (T4 TensorRT latency) and efficiency (parameters, FLOPs). For instance, YOLOv10-S achieves a higher mAP (46.7) than EfficientDet-d2 (43.0) while being significantly faster (2.66ms vs 10.92ms) and having fewer parameters (7.2M vs 8.1M). Even the largest YOLOv10x model surpasses EfficientDet-d7 in mAP (54.4 vs 53.7) with drastically lower latency (12.2ms vs 128.07ms) and roughly half the FLOPs. While CPU ONNX speeds are not available for YOLOv10 in this table, its TensorRT performance strongly suggests superior CPU performance as well compared to EfficientDet.

Conclusion

Both EfficientDet and YOLOv10 are powerful object detection models, but YOLOv10 emerges as the superior choice for most applications, particularly those requiring real-time performance and efficient resource utilization. Its integration into the Ultralytics ecosystem provides significant advantages in terms of ease of use, training efficiency, deployment flexibility, and access to a well-maintained platform with strong community support and extensive documentation.

While EfficientDet can achieve high accuracy with its larger variants, this comes at a significant cost in speed and computational resources. YOLOv10 offers a much better balance, delivering state-of-the-art performance with remarkable efficiency. For developers and researchers seeking a fast, accurate, and easy-to-use object detection solution, YOLOv10 within the Ultralytics framework is the recommended choice.

Explore Other Models

Users interested in exploring alternatives or other advanced models within the Ultralytics ecosystem might consider:

• Ultralytics YOLO11: The latest Ultralytics model, pushing boundaries in speed and efficiency.
• Ultralytics YOLOv9: Known for innovations like Programmable Gradient Information (PGI) and GELAN architecture.
• Ultralytics YOLOv8: A highly versatile and widely adopted model offering a strong balance of speed, accuracy, and support for multiple vision tasks (detection, segmentation, pose, classification).
• RT-DETR: A real-time detection transformer model also available within the Ultralytics framework.

📅 Created 1 year ago ✏️ Updated 1 month ago

Comments