Skip to content

YOLO11 vs. DAMO-YOLO: A Technical Comparison

This page provides a detailed technical comparison between two state-of-the-art object detection models: Ultralytics YOLO11 and DAMO-YOLO. We will analyze their architectural differences, performance metrics, and ideal applications to help you make an informed decision for your computer vision projects. Both models are designed for high-performance object detection, but they employ distinct approaches and exhibit different strengths.

Ultralytics YOLO11

Authors: Glenn Jocher, Jing Qiu
Organization: Ultralytics
Date: 2024-09-27
Arxiv: None
GitHub: https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics
Docs: https://docs.ultralytics.com/models/yolo11/

Ultralytics YOLO11 represents the newest advancement in the renowned YOLO (You Only Look Once) series, celebrated for its rapid and effective object detection capabilities. YOLO11 enhances prior YOLO iterations with architectural enhancements aimed at boosting both precision and speed. It retains the one-stage detection method, processing images in a single pass for real-time performance. A key advantage of YOLO11 is its versatility, supporting tasks like object detection, instance segmentation, image classification, and pose estimation, unlike DAMO-YOLO which primarily focuses on detection.

Architecture and Key Features

YOLO11 focuses on balancing model size and accuracy through architectural improvements. These include refined feature extraction layers for richer feature capture and a streamlined network to cut computational costs, leading to faster and more parameter-efficient models. Its adaptable design allows deployment from edge devices like NVIDIA Jetson to cloud servers.

Crucially, YOLO11 benefits immensely from the well-maintained Ultralytics ecosystem. This includes:

  • Ease of Use: A simple Python API, clear CLI, and extensive documentation make getting started straightforward.
  • Integrated Workflow: Seamless integration with Ultralytics HUB simplifies dataset management, training, and deployment.
  • Training Efficiency: Efficient training processes, readily available pre-trained weights on datasets like COCO, and typically lower memory requirements compared to complex architectures like transformers.
  • Active Development: Frequent updates, strong community support via GitHub and Discord, and numerous integrations.

Performance Metrics

YOLO11 offers models ranging from nano (n) to extra-large (x), achieving an excellent performance balance. YOLO11n achieves a mAPval 50-95 of 39.5 with a compact 2.6M parameters and a rapid CPU ONNX speed of 56.1ms. Larger models like YOLO11x reach 54.7 mAPval 50-95, demonstrating superior accuracy. YOLO11 uses techniques like mixed precision to further accelerate inference.

Strengths

  • High Speed and Efficiency: Exceptional inference speed, ideal for real-time systems.
  • Strong Accuracy: Delivers high mAP, particularly in larger variants, often outperforming DAMO-YOLO at similar scales.
  • Multi-Task Versatility: Supports diverse computer vision tasks beyond detection.
  • User-Friendly: Easy to use within the comprehensive Ultralytics ecosystem.
  • Flexible Deployment: Optimized for a range of hardware, with clear CPU benchmarks available.
  • Well-Maintained Ecosystem: Actively developed and supported.

Weaknesses

  • Speed-Accuracy Trade-off: Smaller models prioritize speed over utmost accuracy.
  • One-Stage Limitations: May face challenges with very small objects compared to some two-stage detectors.

Ideal Use Cases

YOLO11 is excellent for real-time applications such as:

Learn more about YOLO11

DAMO-YOLO

Authors: Xianzhe Xu, Yiqi Jiang, Weihua Chen, Yilun Huang, Yuan Zhang, and Xiuyu Sun
Organization: Alibaba Group
Date: 2022-11-23
Arxiv Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.15444v2
GitHub Link: https://github.com/tinyvision/DAMO-YOLO
Docs Link: https://github.com/tinyvision/DAMO-YOLO/blob/master/README.md

DAMO-YOLO is an object detection model developed by the Alibaba Group. It focuses on achieving a balance between high accuracy and efficient inference by incorporating several novel techniques in its architecture.

Architecture and Key Features

DAMO-YOLO introduces several innovative components:

  • NAS Backbones: Utilizes Neural Architecture Search (NAS) to optimize the backbone network.
  • Efficient RepGFPN: Employs a Reparameterized Gradient Feature Pyramid Network (RepGFPN) for feature fusion.
  • ZeroHead: A decoupled detection head designed to minimize computational overhead.
  • AlignedOTA: Features an Aligned Optimal Transport Assignment strategy for label assignment.
  • Distillation Enhancement: Incorporates knowledge distillation techniques.

While these techniques are innovative, integrating DAMO-YOLO into production workflows can be more challenging compared to the streamlined experience offered by Ultralytics YOLO11.

Performance Metrics

DAMO-YOLO offers different model sizes (tiny, small, medium, large). DAMO-YOLOl reaches a mAPval 50-95 of 50.8. While competitive, larger YOLO11 models achieve higher accuracy (up to 54.7 mAP). Notably, standardized CPU benchmark results are less readily available for DAMO-YOLO compared to YOLO11.

Strengths

  • High Accuracy: Achieves strong mAP scores.
  • Efficient Architecture: Incorporates techniques like NAS backbones and ZeroHead.
  • Innovative Techniques: Uses methods like AlignedOTA and RepGFPN.

Weaknesses

  • Limited Integration: Requires more effort to integrate into established workflows like those provided by Ultralytics.
  • Documentation & Support: Documentation and community support may be less extensive compared to the well-established YOLO series and the dedicated support from Ultralytics.
  • Task Specificity: Primarily focused on object detection, lacking the built-in versatility of YOLO11 for segmentation, classification, and pose estimation.
  • Benchmarking Gaps: Fewer readily available benchmarks, especially for CPU performance.

Ideal Use Cases

DAMO-YOLO is suited for applications where high detection accuracy is paramount and integration effort is less of a concern:

  • High-precision applications: Detailed image analysis, scientific research.
  • Scenarios requiring robust detection: Complex environments, occluded objects.
  • Research: Exploring advanced object detection architectures.

Learn more about DAMO-YOLO

Performance Comparison

The table below compares various sizes of YOLO11 and DAMO-YOLO models based on their performance metrics on the COCO dataset. YOLO11 demonstrates superior accuracy in the largest model size (YOLO11x) and offers significantly faster CPU inference speeds across its range, highlighting its efficiency and suitability for diverse deployment scenarios. Furthermore, YOLO11 models, particularly the smaller variants like YOLO11n, are significantly more parameter-efficient.

Model size
(pixels)
mAPval
50-95
Speed
CPU ONNX
(ms)
Speed
T4 TensorRT10
(ms)
params
(M)
FLOPs
(B)
YOLO11n 640 39.5 56.1 1.5 2.6 6.5
YOLO11s 640 47.0 90.0 2.5 9.4 21.5
YOLO11m 640 51.5 183.2 4.7 20.1 68.0
YOLO11l 640 53.4 238.6 6.2 25.3 86.9
YOLO11x 640 54.7 462.8 11.3 56.9 194.9
DAMO-YOLOt 640 42.0 - 2.32 8.5 18.1
DAMO-YOLOs 640 46.0 - 3.45 16.3 37.8
DAMO-YOLOm 640 49.2 - 5.09 28.2 61.8
DAMO-YOLOl 640 50.8 - 7.18 42.1 97.3

Conclusion

Both YOLO11 and DAMO-YOLO are powerful object detection models. However, Ultralytics YOLO11 stands out due to its superior balance of speed and accuracy, exceptional ease of use, versatility across multiple vision tasks, and integration within a robust, well-maintained ecosystem. Its efficient architecture, readily available benchmarks (including CPU speeds), and streamlined workflows via Ultralytics HUB make it the recommended choice for developers and researchers seeking high performance combined with practical usability for a wide range of real-world applications. DAMO-YOLO offers innovative techniques but may require more integration effort and lacks the multi-task capabilities and extensive support system of YOLO11.

Explore Other Models

Users might also be interested in comparing DAMO-YOLO with other models available in the Ultralytics documentation:



📅 Created 1 year ago ✏️ Updated 1 month ago

Comments