Skip to content

YOLOv10 vs PP-YOLOE+: A Technical Comparison for Object Detection

Choosing the optimal object detection model is crucial for balancing accuracy, speed, and computational resources in computer vision tasks. This page offers a technical comparison between YOLOv10 and PP-YOLOE+, two advanced models known for their efficiency and effectiveness. We analyze their architectures, performance, and applications to guide your decision, highlighting the advantages of YOLOv10 within the Ultralytics ecosystem.

YOLOv10 Overview

YOLOv10 is the latest iteration in the YOLO series, focusing on real-time, end-to-end object detection. Developed by researchers at Tsinghua University, YOLOv10 enhances both performance and efficiency, particularly through its NMS-free design.

Technical Details:

Learn more about YOLOv10

Key Features and Architecture

YOLOv10 introduces significant architectural improvements for efficiency and accuracy:

  • NMS-Free Training: Employs consistent dual assignments, eliminating the need for Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS) post-processing. This simplifies deployment and reduces inference latency, a key advantage for real-time applications.
  • Holistic Efficiency-Accuracy Driven Design: Optimizes various components like the classification head and downsampling layers to reduce computational redundancy and enhance model capability.
  • Anchor-Free Detection: Like many modern detectors, it uses an anchor-free approach, simplifying the architecture and improving generalization.
  • Scalable Model Sizes: Offers variants from Nano (N) to Extra-large (X), allowing users to balance speed and accuracy based on hardware constraints.
  • Ultralytics Ecosystem Integration: Benefits from seamless integration with the Ultralytics Python package and Ultralytics HUB, offering a streamlined user experience, extensive documentation, efficient training processes, and readily available pre-trained weights.

Performance Metrics

YOLOv10 achieves an excellent balance of speed and accuracy, often outperforming competitors in efficiency:

  • mAP: Reaches up to 54.4% mAPval50-95 on the COCO dataset (YOLO Performance Metrics).
  • Inference Speed: YOLOv10n achieves a remarkable 1.56ms latency on T4 TensorRT10, showcasing its real-time capabilities (OpenVINO Latency vs Throughput Modes).
  • Model Size: Ranges from an exceptionally small 2.3M parameters (YOLOv10n) to 56.9M (YOLOv10x), demonstrating superior parameter efficiency compared to PP-YOLOE+.

Use Cases

YOLOv10's real-time capabilities and efficiency make it ideal for:

Strengths and Weaknesses

Strengths:

  • Superior speed and efficiency, especially NMS-free inference.
  • Excellent balance between speed and accuracy.
  • Highly scalable across different model sizes.
  • Lower memory requirements and efficient training.
  • Ease of use and strong support within the well-maintained Ultralytics ecosystem.

Weaknesses:

  • As a newer model, the community outside Ultralytics might be smaller compared to long-established models.
  • Achieving peak performance might require specific optimization for certain hardware.

PP-YOLOE+ Overview

PP-YOLOE+, developed by Baidu, is an enhanced version of PP-YOLOE, focusing on high accuracy and efficiency within the PaddlePaddle framework.

Technical Details:

Learn more about PP-YOLOE+

Key Features and Architecture

PP-YOLOE+ builds upon an anchor-free paradigm with specific enhancements:

  • Anchor-Free Design: Simplifies detection heads.
  • CSPRepResNet Backbone: Uses CSPNet and RepResNet principles for feature extraction.
  • Advanced Loss and Head: Incorporates Varifocal Loss and an efficient ET-Head.

Performance Metrics

PP-YOLOE+ offers competitive performance, particularly in accuracy for larger models:

  • mAP: Achieves up to 54.7% mAPval50-95 on COCO with the PP-YOLOE+x model.
  • Inference Speed: PP-YOLOE+s reaches 2.62ms latency on T4 TensorRT10.
  • Model Size: Larger models have significantly more parameters and FLOPs compared to YOLOv10 equivalents (e.g., PP-YOLOE+x has 98.42M params vs. YOLOv10x's 56.9M).

Use Cases

PP-YOLOE+ is suitable for various object detection tasks, especially within its native ecosystem:

  • General Object Detection: Effective for standard detection tasks.
  • Industrial Applications: Suited for industrial inspection and robotics (AI in Manufacturing).
  • PaddlePaddle Ecosystem: Best leveraged by users already working within the PaddlePaddle framework.

Strengths and Weaknesses

Strengths:

  • High accuracy, especially with larger models.
  • Efficient anchor-free design.
  • Strong integration with the PaddlePaddle framework.

Weaknesses:

  • Primarily optimized for PaddlePaddle, limiting flexibility for users of other frameworks like PyTorch.
  • Larger models are less parameter-efficient compared to YOLOv10.
  • Smaller community support compared to the broader YOLO ecosystem fostered by Ultralytics.

Model Comparison Table

Model size
(pixels)
mAPval
50-95
Speed
CPU ONNX
(ms)
Speed
T4 TensorRT10
(ms)
params
(M)
FLOPs
(B)
YOLOv10n 640 39.5 - 1.56 2.3 6.7
YOLOv10s 640 46.7 - 2.66 7.2 21.6
YOLOv10m 640 51.3 - 5.48 15.4 59.1
YOLOv10b 640 52.7 - 6.54 24.4 92.0
YOLOv10l 640 53.3 - 8.33 29.5 120.3
YOLOv10x 640 54.4 - 12.2 56.9 160.4
PP-YOLOE+t 640 39.9 - 2.84 4.85 19.15
PP-YOLOE+s 640 43.7 - 2.62 7.93 17.36
PP-YOLOE+m 640 49.8 - 5.56 23.43 49.91
PP-YOLOE+l 640 52.9 - 8.36 52.2 110.07
PP-YOLOE+x 640 54.7 - 14.3 98.42 206.59

Conclusion

Both YOLOv10 and PP-YOLOE+ are powerful object detection models offering a balance between speed and accuracy. YOLOv10 stands out for its exceptional efficiency (especially NMS-free inference and lower parameters/FLOPs), scalability across various model sizes, and seamless integration within the comprehensive and actively maintained Ultralytics ecosystem. This makes YOLOv10 a highly versatile and user-friendly choice, particularly for developers seeking ease of use, efficient training, and deployment flexibility across different platforms. PP-YOLOE+ offers competitive accuracy, especially its largest variant, but is primarily tailored for the PaddlePaddle framework and is generally less parameter-efficient.

For users prioritizing cutting-edge efficiency, ease of use, and the benefits of a robust ecosystem with strong community support, YOLOv10 is the recommended choice. For those deeply integrated into the PaddlePaddle ecosystem, PP-YOLOE+ remains a strong contender.

Explore Other Models

Consider exploring other state-of-the-art models available within the Ultralytics documentation for diverse object detection needs:

📅 Created 1 year ago ✏️ Updated 1 month ago

Comments