Quick Start Guide: NVIDIA Jetson with Ultralytics YOLO26#
This guide walks through deploying Ultralytics YOLO26 on NVIDIA Jetson devices and includes performance benchmarks that show what YOLO26 can do on these compact, power-efficient devices.
We have updated this guide with the latest NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor Developer Kit which delivers up to 2070 FP4 TFLOPS of AI compute and 128 GB of memory with power configurable between 40 W and 130 W. It delivers over 7.5x higher AI compute than NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin, with 3.5x better energy efficiency for running the most popular AI models.
Watch: Unlock Faster Inference with Ultralytics YOLO26 on NVIDIA Jetson Devices 🚀

This guide has been tested with NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor Developer Kit (Jetson T5000) and NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin Developer Kit (64GB) running the latest stable JetPack 7.2, NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super Developer Kit running JetPack release of JP6.1, Seeed Studio reComputer J4012 which is based on NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16GB running JetPack release of JP6.0/ JetPack release of JP5.1.3 and Seeed Studio reComputer J1020 v2 which is based on NVIDIA Jetson Nano 4GB running JetPack release of JP4.6.1. It is expected to work across all the NVIDIA Jetson hardware lineup, including the latest and legacy devices.
What is NVIDIA Jetson?#
NVIDIA Jetson is a series of embedded computing boards designed to bring accelerated AI (artificial intelligence) computing to edge devices. These compact and powerful devices are built around NVIDIA's GPU architecture and can run complex AI algorithms and deep learning models directly on the device, without relying on cloud computing resources. Jetson boards are often used in robotics, autonomous vehicles, industrial automation, and other applications where AI inference needs to be performed locally with low latency and high efficiency. Additionally, these boards are based on the ARM64 architecture and run at lower power compared to traditional GPU computing devices.
NVIDIA Jetson Series Comparison#
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor is the latest iteration of the NVIDIA Jetson family based on the NVIDIA Blackwell architecture, which delivers significantly higher AI performance than previous generations. The table below compares a few of the Jetson devices in the ecosystem.
| Jetson AGX Thor (T5000) | Jetson AGX Orin 64GB | Jetson Orin NX 16GB | Jetson Orin Nano Super | Jetson AGX Xavier | Jetson Xavier NX | Jetson Nano | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Performance | 2070 TFLOPS | 275 TOPS | 100 TOPS | 67 TOPS | 32 TOPS | 21 TOPS | 472 GFLOPS |
| GPU | 2560-core NVIDIA Blackwell architecture GPU with 96 Tensor Cores | 2048-core NVIDIA Ampere architecture GPU with 64 Tensor Cores | 1024-core NVIDIA Ampere architecture GPU with 32 Tensor Cores | 1024-core NVIDIA Ampere architecture GPU with 32 Tensor Cores | 512-core NVIDIA Volta architecture GPU with 64 Tensor Cores | 384-core NVIDIA Volta™ architecture GPU with 48 Tensor Cores | 128-core NVIDIA Maxwell™ architecture GPU |
| GPU Max Frequency | 1.57 GHz | 1.3 GHz | 918 MHz | 1020 MHz | 1377 MHz | 1100 MHz | 921MHz |
| CPU | 14-core Arm® Neoverse®-V3AE 64-bit CPU 1MB L2 + 16MB L3 | 12-core NVIDIA Arm® Cortex A78AE v8.2 64-bit CPU 3MB L2 + 6MB L3 | 8-core NVIDIA Arm® Cortex A78AE v8.2 64-bit CPU 2MB L2 + 4MB L3 | 6-core Arm® Cortex®-A78AE v8.2 64-bit CPU 1.5MB L2 + 4MB L3 | 8-core NVIDIA Carmel Arm®v8.2 64-bit CPU 8MB L2 + 4MB L3 | 6-core NVIDIA Carmel Arm®v8.2 64-bit CPU 6MB L2 + 4MB L3 | Quad-Core Arm® Cortex®-A57 MPCore processor |
| CPU Max Frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz | 2.0 GHz | 1.7 GHz | 2.2 GHz | 1.9 GHz | 1.43GHz |
| Memory | 128GB 256-bit LPDDR5X 273GB/s | 64GB 256-bit LPDDR5 204.8GB/s | 16GB 128-bit LPDDR5 102.4GB/s | 8GB 128-bit LPDDR5 102 GB/s | 32GB 256-bit LPDDR4x 136.5GB/s | 8GB 128-bit LPDDR4x 59.7GB/s | 4GB 64-bit LPDDR4 25.6GB/s |
What is NVIDIA JetPack?#
NVIDIA JetPack SDK powers the Jetson modules and provides a full development environment for building end-to-end accelerated AI applications. JetPack includes Jetson Linux with bootloader, Linux kernel, Ubuntu desktop environment, and a complete set of libraries for acceleration of GPU computing, multimedia, graphics, and computer vision. It also includes samples, documentation, and developer tools for both host computer and developer kit, and supports higher level SDKs such as DeepStream for streaming video analytics, Isaac for robotics, and Riva for conversational AI.
Flash JetPack to NVIDIA Jetson#
The first step after getting your hands on an NVIDIA Jetson device is to flash NVIDIA JetPack to the device. There are several different ways of flashing NVIDIA Jetson devices.
- For JetPack 7.2 on an official Jetson AGX Thor, AGX Orin, or Orin Nano Developer Kit, download the unified Jetson ISO, write it to a USB flash drive, and follow the device-specific quick start for AGX Thor, AGX Orin, or Orin Nano. Starting with JetPack 7.2, Orin Nano no longer uses a downloadable SD-card image; the ISO USB installs Jetson Linux onto the device's microSD card or NVMe SSD.
- If you intentionally use JetPack 6 on a Jetson Orin Nano Developer Kit, follow NVIDIA's JetPack 6.x update and SD-card instructions.
- If you own any other NVIDIA Development Kit, you can flash JetPack to the device using SDK Manager.
- If you own a Seeed Studio reComputer J4012 device, you can flash JetPack to the included SSD and if you own a Seeed Studio reComputer J1020 v2 device, you can flash JetPack to the eMMC/ SSD.
- If you own any other third-party device powered by the NVIDIA Jetson module, it is recommended to follow command-line flashing.
For methods 1, 4 and 5 above, after flashing the system and booting the device, run sudo apt update && sudo apt install nvidia-jetpack -y in the device terminal to install all the remaining JetPack components needed.
JetPack Support Based on Jetson Device#
The below table highlights NVIDIA JetPack versions supported by different NVIDIA Jetson devices.
| JetPack 4 | JetPack 5 | JetPack 6 | JetPack 7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jetson Nano | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Jetson TX2 | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Jetson Xavier NX | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Jetson AGX Xavier | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Jetson AGX Orin | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Jetson Orin NX | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Jetson Orin Nano | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Jetson AGX Thor | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
Quick Start with Docker#
The fastest way to get started with Ultralytics YOLO26 on NVIDIA Jetson is to run the pre-built Docker images for Jetson. Refer to the table above and choose the JetPack version according to the Jetson device you own.
t=ultralytics/ultralytics:latest-jetson-jetpack4
sudo docker pull $t && sudo docker run -it --ipc=host --runtime=nvidia $tThe latest-nvidia-arm64 image uses NVIDIA PyTorch 26.08, including CUDA 13.4 and TensorRT 11.2. NVIDIA lists JetPack 7.1 for PyTorch in its compatibility table, but TensorRT 11.2.1 does not support JetPack, including Thor. Use this image only for PyTorch workloads on a supported host. For Jetson TensorRT exports, use the native installation below with the TensorRT 10.x runtime supported by your JetPack release. JetPack 7.2 on Thor or Orin requires separate container validation. Rebuild engines for the target GPU and TensorRT version.
For JetPack 4, 5, and 6 images, continue to Use TensorRT on NVIDIA Jetson. The JetPack 7.1 image above is for PyTorch workloads only.
Start with Native Installation#
For a native installation without Docker, please refer to the steps below.
Run on JetPack 7.2#
Install Ultralytics Package#
Install the Ultralytics package on the Jetson. Export dependencies are installed automatically the first time you export a model, so only the base package is needed here. This guide focuses on NVIDIA TensorRT exports because TensorRT delivers the best performance on Jetson devices.
-
Update packages list, install pip and upgrade to latest
sudo apt update sudo apt install python3-pip -y pip install -U pip -
Install
ultralyticspip packagepip install ultralytics -
Reboot the device
sudo reboot
Install PyTorch and Torchvision#
The above ultralytics installation will install Torch and Torchvision. However, these two packages installed via pip are not compatible with JetPack 7.2 devices running CUDA 13, so they need to be installed manually.
Install torch and torchvision according to JP7.2
pip install torch torchvision --index-url https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu130Install onnxruntime-gpu#
Use an ONNX Runtime GPU wheel matched to your JetPack, Python, and CUDA versions. Current PyPI releases include ARM64 wheels, but they do not replace the device-specific packages for every JetPack release.
Download and install onnxruntime-gpu 1.24.0 with Python3.12 support.
pip install https://github.com/ultralytics/assets/releases/download/v0.0.0/onnxruntime_gpu-1.24.0-cp312-cp312-linux_aarch64.whlRun on JetPack 6.1#
Install Ultralytics Package#
Install the Ultralytics package on the Jetson. Export dependencies are installed automatically the first time you export a model, so only the base package is needed here. This guide focuses on NVIDIA TensorRT exports because TensorRT delivers the best performance on Jetson devices.
-
Update packages list, install pip and upgrade to latest
sudo apt update sudo apt install python3-pip -y pip install -U pip -
Install
ultralyticspip packagepip install ultralytics -
Reboot the device
sudo reboot
Install PyTorch and Torchvision#
The above ultralytics installation will install Torch and Torchvision. However, these two packages installed via pip are not compatible with the Jetson platform, which is based on ARM64 architecture, so you need to manually install a pre-built PyTorch pip wheel and compile or install Torchvision from source.
Install torch 2.10.0 and torchvision 0.25.0 according to JP6.1
pip install https://github.com/ultralytics/assets/releases/download/v0.0.0/torch-2.10.0-cp310-cp310-linux_aarch64.whl
pip install https://github.com/ultralytics/assets/releases/download/v0.0.0/torchvision-0.25.0-cp310-cp310-linux_aarch64.whlVisit the PyTorch for Jetson page to access all different versions of PyTorch for different JetPack versions. For a more detailed list on the PyTorch, Torchvision compatibility, visit the PyTorch and Torchvision compatibility page.
Install cuDSS to fix a dependency issue with torch 2.10.0
wget https://developer.download.nvidia.com/compute/cudss/0.7.1/local_installers/cudss-local-tegra-repo-ubuntu2204-0.7.1_0.7.1-1_arm64.deb
sudo dpkg -i cudss-local-tegra-repo-ubuntu2204-0.7.1_0.7.1-1_arm64.deb
sudo cp /var/cudss-local-tegra-repo-ubuntu2204-0.7.1/cudss-*-keyring.gpg /usr/share/keyrings/
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get -y install cudssInstall onnxruntime-gpu#
Use an ONNX Runtime GPU wheel matched to your JetPack, Python, and CUDA versions. Current PyPI releases include ARM64 wheels, but they do not replace the device-specific packages for every JetPack release.
You can find all available onnxruntime-gpu packages—organized by JetPack version, Python version, and other compatibility details—in the Jetson Zoo ONNX Runtime compatibility matrix.
For JetPack 6 with Python 3.10 support, you can install onnxruntime-gpu 1.23.0:
pip install https://github.com/ultralytics/assets/releases/download/v0.0.0/onnxruntime_gpu-1.23.0-cp310-cp310-linux_aarch64.whlAlternatively, for onnxruntime-gpu 1.20.0:
pip install https://github.com/ultralytics/assets/releases/download/v0.0.0/onnxruntime_gpu-1.20.0-cp310-cp310-linux_aarch64.whlRun on JetPack 5.1.2#
Install Ultralytics Package#
Install the Ultralytics package on the Jetson. Export dependencies are installed automatically the first time you export a model, so only the base package is needed here. This guide focuses on NVIDIA TensorRT exports because TensorRT delivers the best performance on Jetson devices.
-
Update packages list, install pip and upgrade to latest
sudo apt update sudo apt install python3-pip -y pip install -U pip -
Install
ultralyticspip packagepip install ultralytics -
Reboot the device
sudo reboot
Install PyTorch and Torchvision#
The above ultralytics installation will install Torch and Torchvision. However, these two packages installed via pip are not compatible with the Jetson platform, which is based on ARM64 architecture, so you need to manually install a pre-built PyTorch pip wheel and compile or install Torchvision from source.
-
Uninstall currently installed PyTorch and Torchvision
pip uninstall torch torchvision -
Install
torch 2.1.0andtorchvision 0.16.2according to JP5.1.2pip install https://github.com/ultralytics/assets/releases/download/v0.0.0/torch-2.1.0a0+41361538.nv23.06-cp38-cp38-linux_aarch64.whl pip install https://github.com/ultralytics/assets/releases/download/v0.0.0/torchvision-0.16.2+c6f3977-cp38-cp38-linux_aarch64.whl
Visit the PyTorch for Jetson page to access all different versions of PyTorch for different JetPack versions. For a more detailed list on the PyTorch, Torchvision compatibility, visit the PyTorch and Torchvision compatibility page.
Install onnxruntime-gpu#
Use an ONNX Runtime GPU wheel matched to your JetPack, Python, and CUDA versions. Current PyPI releases include ARM64 wheels, but they do not replace the device-specific packages for every JetPack release.
You can find all available onnxruntime-gpu packages—organized by JetPack version, Python version, and other compatibility details—in the Jetson Zoo ONNX Runtime compatibility matrix. Download and install onnxruntime-gpu 1.17.0 with Python3.8 support.
wget https://nvidia.box.com/shared/static/zostg6agm00fb6t5uisw51qi6kpcuwzd.whl -O onnxruntime_gpu-1.17.0-cp38-cp38-linux_aarch64.whl
pip install onnxruntime_gpu-1.17.0-cp38-cp38-linux_aarch64.whlonnxruntime-gpu automatically upgrades NumPy to the latest version, so reinstall NumPy 1.23.5 to fix the resulting issue:
pip install numpy==1.23.5
Use TensorRT on NVIDIA Jetson#
Among all the model export formats supported by Ultralytics, TensorRT offers the highest inference performance on NVIDIA Jetson devices, making it our top recommendation for Jetson deployments. Before exporting, install the TensorRT Python bindings supplied for your JetPack release and verify them with python3 -c "import tensorrt; print(tensorrt.__version__)". Keep the supported TensorRT 10.x runtime on JetPack 6/7; do not replace it with TensorRT 11.2.1. For setup instructions and advanced usage, see our dedicated TensorRT integration guide.
You can also export from the browser without configuring the build environment locally. In the Ultralytics Platform model Export tab, select TensorRT and the intended Jetson target. Thor selections are validated on physical Thor hardware. The six Orin selections currently produce AGX-Orin-built candidate engines; validate them on the intended Orin SKU before deployment.
TensorRT profiles and tunes an engine on its build GPU. Match the target's GPU architecture and TensorRT/CUDA runtime, and validate every downloaded engine on the deployment device. Same-architecture Orin SKUs are not an automatic portability guarantee, and INT8 calibration should use the target device for best results.
Convert Model to TensorRT and Run Inference#
The YOLO26n model in PyTorch format is converted to TensorRT to run inference with the exported model.
from ultralytics import YOLO
# Load a YOLO26n PyTorch model
model = YOLO("yolo26n.pt")
# Export the model to TensorRT
model.export(format="engine") # creates 'yolo26n.engine'
# Load the exported TensorRT model
trt_model = YOLO("yolo26n.engine")
# Run inference
results = trt_model("https://ultralytics.com/images/bus.jpg")Use NVIDIA Deep Learning Accelerator (DLA)#
NVIDIA Deep Learning Accelerator (DLA) is a specialized hardware component built into NVIDIA Jetson devices that optimizes deep learning inference for energy efficiency and performance. By offloading tasks from the GPU (freeing it up for more intensive processes), DLA enables models to run with lower power consumption while maintaining high throughput, ideal for embedded systems and real-time AI applications.
NVIDIA lists TensorRT 10.7 as the last release with DLA support; TensorRT 11.x does not support DLA. Use a DLA-capable TensorRT release supported by your JetPack version. TensorRT 11.2.1 does not support JetPack, including GPU-only exports.
The following Jetson devices are equipped with DLA hardware:
| Jetson Device | DLA Cores | DLA Max Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Jetson AGX Orin Series | 2 | 1.6 GHz |
| Jetson Orin NX 16GB | 2 | 614 MHz |
| Jetson Orin NX 8GB | 1 | 614 MHz |
| Jetson AGX Xavier Series | 2 | 1.4 GHz |
| Jetson Xavier NX Series | 2 | 1.1 GHz |
from ultralytics import YOLO
# Load a YOLO26n PyTorch model
model = YOLO("yolo26n.pt")
# Export the model to TensorRT with DLA enabled (only works with FP16 or INT8)
model.export(format="engine", device="dla:0", quantize=16) # dla:0 or dla:1 corresponds to the DLA cores
# Load the exported TensorRT model
trt_model = YOLO("yolo26n.engine")
# Run inference
results = trt_model("https://ultralytics.com/images/bus.jpg")When using DLA exports, some layers may not be supported to run on DLA and will fall back to the GPU for execution. This fallback can introduce additional latency and impact the overall inference performance. Therefore, DLA is not primarily designed to reduce inference latency compared to TensorRT running entirely on the GPU. Instead, its primary purpose is to increase throughput and improve energy efficiency.
NVIDIA Jetson YOLO26 Benchmarks#
YOLO26 benchmarks were run by the Ultralytics team on 11 different model formats measuring speed and accuracy: PyTorch, TorchScript, ONNX, OpenVINO, TensorRT, TF SavedModel, TF GraphDef, TF Lite, MNN, NCNN, ExecuTorch. Benchmarks were run on NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor Developer Kit, NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin Developer Kit (64GB), NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super Developer Kit and Seeed Studio reComputer J4012 powered by Jetson Orin NX 16GB device at FP32 precision with the default input image size of 640.
Comparison Charts#
Even though all model exports work on NVIDIA Jetson, the comparison chart below includes only PyTorch, TorchScript, and TensorRT. You can find benchmarks for all exports in the section after this chart.
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor Developer Kit#
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin Developer Kit (64GB)#
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super Developer Kit#
NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16GB#
Detailed Comparison Tables#
The table below shows the benchmark results for five different YOLO26 models (YOLO26n, YOLO26s, YOLO26m, YOLO26l, YOLO26x) across 11 different formats (PyTorch, TorchScript, ONNX, OpenVINO, TensorRT, TF SavedModel, TF GraphDef, TF Lite, MNN, NCNN, ExecuTorch), giving the status, size, mAP50-95(B) metric, and inference time for each combination.
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor Developer Kit#
| Format | Status | Size on disk (MB) | mAP50-95(B) | Inference time (ms/im) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PyTorch | ✅ | 5.3 | 0.4798 | 7.39 |
| TorchScript | ✅ | 9.8 | 0.4789 | 4.21 |
| ONNX | ✅ | 9.5 | 0.4767 | 6.58 |
| OpenVINO | ✅ | 10.1 | 0.4794 | 17.50 |
| TensorRT (FP32) | ✅ | 13.9 | 0.4791 | 1.90 |
| TensorRT (FP16) | ✅ | 7.6 | 0.4797 | 1.39 |
| TensorRT (INT8) | ✅ | 6.5 | 0.4273 | 1.52 |
| TF SavedModel | ✅ | 25.7 | 0.4764 | 47.24 |
| TF GraphDef | ✅ | 9.5 | 0.4764 | 45.98 |
| TF Lite | ✅ | 9.9 | 0.4764 | 182.04 |
| MNN | ✅ | 9.4 | 0.4784 | 21.83 |
Benchmarked with Ultralytics 8.4.7
Inference time does not include pre/post-processing.
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin Developer Kit (64GB)#
| Format | Status | Size on disk (MB) | mAP50-95(B) | Inference time (ms/im) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PyTorch | ✅ | 5.3 | 0.4790 | 11.58 |
| TorchScript | ✅ | 9.8 | 0.4770 | 4.60 |
| ONNX | ✅ | 9.5 | 0.4770 | 9.87 |
| OpenVINO | ✅ | 9.6 | 0.4820 | 28.80 |
| TensorRT (FP32) | ✅ | 11.5 | 0.4770 | 4.18 |
| TensorRT (FP16) | ✅ | 7.9 | 0.4789 | 2.62 |
| TensorRT (INT8) | ✅ | 5.4 | 0.4640 | 2.30 |
| TF SavedModel | ✅ | 24.6 | 0.4760 | 71.10 |
| TF GraphDef | ✅ | 9.5 | 0.4760 | 70.02 |
| TF Lite | ✅ | 9.9 | 0.4760 | 227.94 |
| MNN | ✅ | 9.4 | 0.4760 | 32.46 |
| NCNN | ✅ | 9.3 | 0.4810 | 29.93 |
Benchmarked with Ultralytics 8.4.32
Inference time does not include pre/post-processing.
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super Developer Kit#
| Format | Status | Size on disk (MB) | mAP50-95(B) | Inference time (ms/im) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PyTorch | ✅ | 5.3 | 0.4790 | 15.60 |
| TorchScript | ✅ | 9.8 | 0.4770 | 12.60 |
| ONNX | ✅ | 9.5 | 0.4760 | 15.76 |
| OpenVINO | ✅ | 9.6 | 0.4820 | 56.23 |
| TensorRT (FP32) | ✅ | 11.3 | 0.4770 | 7.53 |
| TensorRT (FP16) | ✅ | 8.1 | 0.4800 | 4.57 |
| TensorRT (INT8) | ✅ | 5.3 | 0.4490 | 3.80 |
| TF SavedModel | ✅ | 24.6 | 0.4760 | 118.33 |
| TF GraphDef | ✅ | 9.5 | 0.4760 | 116.30 |
| TF Lite | ✅ | 9.9 | 0.4760 | 286.00 |
| MNN | ✅ | 9.4 | 0.4760 | 68.77 |
| NCNN | ✅ | 9.3 | 0.4810 | 47.50 |
Benchmarked with Ultralytics 8.4.33
Inference time does not include pre/post-processing.
NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16GB#
| Format | Status | Size on disk (MB) | mAP50-95(B) | Inference time (ms/im) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PyTorch | ✅ | 5.3 | 0.4799 | 13.90 |
| TorchScript | ✅ | 9.8 | 0.4787 | 11.60 |
| ONNX | ✅ | 9.5 | 0.4763 | 14.18 |
| OpenVINO | ✅ | 9.6 | 0.4819 | 40.19 |
| TensorRT (FP32) | ✅ | 11.4 | 0.4770 | 7.01 |
| TensorRT (FP16) | ✅ | 8.0 | 0.4789 | 4.13 |
| TensorRT (INT8) | ✅ | 5.5 | 0.4489 | 3.49 |
| TF SavedModel | ✅ | 24.6 | 0.4764 | 92.34 |
| TF GraphDef | ✅ | 9.5 | 0.4764 | 92.06 |
| TF Lite | ✅ | 9.9 | 0.4764 | 254.43 |
| MNN | ✅ | 9.4 | 0.4760 | 48.55 |
| NCNN | ✅ | 9.3 | 0.4805 | 34.31 |
Benchmarked with Ultralytics 8.4.33
Inference time does not include pre/post-processing.
Explore more benchmarking efforts by Seeed Studio running on different versions of NVIDIA Jetson hardware.
Reproduce Our Results#
To reproduce the above Ultralytics benchmarks on all export formats run this code:
from ultralytics import YOLO
# Load a YOLO26n PyTorch model
model = YOLO("yolo26n.pt")
# Benchmark YOLO26n speed and accuracy on the COCO128 dataset for all export formats
results = model.benchmark(data="coco128.yaml", imgsz=640)Note that benchmarking results might vary based on the exact hardware and software configuration of a system, as well as the current workload of the system at the time the benchmarks are run. For the most reliable results, use a dataset with a large number of images, e.g., data='coco.yaml' (5000 val images).
Best Practices when using NVIDIA Jetson#
Follow these best practices to get maximum performance from YOLO26 on NVIDIA Jetson.
-
Enable MAX Power Mode
Enabling MAX Power Mode on the Jetson makes sure all CPU and GPU cores are turned on.
sudo nvpmodel -m 0 -
Enable Jetson Clocks
Enabling Jetson Clocks makes sure all CPU and GPU cores are clocked at their maximum frequency.
sudo jetson_clocks -
Install Jetson Stats Application
Use the jetson-stats application to monitor the temperatures of system components, view CPU, GPU, and RAM utilization, change power modes, set max clocks, and check JetPack information.
sudo apt update sudo pip install jetson-stats sudo reboot jtop
Memory Optimization Tips for NVIDIA Jetson#
Available memory is often the limiting factor on Jetson devices, particularly on lower-memory variants such as the Jetson Orin Nano (8 GB) or Orin NX 8 GB. The tips below are practical, low-risk changes that can collectively free several hundred megabytes and let you run larger YOLO models or support additional parallel workloads. For a comprehensive treatment see the NVIDIA blog on maximizing memory efficiency on Jetson.
1. Switch to Headless (No-GUI) Boot#
If your Jetson is connected over SSH or running as a production appliance without a display attached, eliminating the desktop environment and display server can recover up to 865 MB of RAM:
sudo systemctl set-default multi-user.target
sudo rebootTo restore the desktop later:
sudo systemctl set-default graphical.target
sudo reboot2. Disable Unused System Services#
Non-essential background services (Bluetooth, connectivity managers, unused hardware daemons) consume around 32 MB combined. List active services and disable anything your deployment doesn't require:
# List running services
systemctl list-units --type=service --state=running
# Disable a service
sudo systemctl disable SERVICE_NAME3. Profile Memory Usage#
Before optimizing, identify which processes are actually consuming RAM. procrank sorts processes by PSS (Proportional Set Size), which reflects the true per-process memory footprint more accurately than RSS (Resident Set Size, the total physical RAM pages mapped by a process, including pages shared with other processes):
git clone https://github.com/csimmonds/procrank_linux.git
cd procrank_linux && make
sudo ./procrankTo see per-process GPU and NvMap (CUDA/video pipeline) allocations:
sudo cat /sys/kernel/debug/nvmap/iovmm/clients4. Run Inference Without a Display in Production#
For inference pipelines that have no live-preview requirement, disabling display-related components (Tiler, OSD, DisplaySink) can save 200+ MB from the pipeline alone. With Ultralytics YOLO, suppress the viewer and write results to disk instead:
from ultralytics import YOLO
model = YOLO("yolo26n.engine")
# show=False prevents any display window; save=True writes annotated output to disk
results = model.predict(source="video.mp4", show=False, save=True)Cumulative Impact#
| Optimization | Approx. Memory Saved |
|---|---|
| Disable desktop GUI | ~865 MB |
| Disable unused OS services | ~32 MB |
| Headless inference pipeline (no display) | ~200+ MB |
| Total (easy wins) | ~1 GB+ |
Combining these changes is especially valuable when targeting TensorRT INT8 models on memory-constrained devices — it can be the difference between fitting a larger model variant in memory or not.
Next Steps#
For further learning and support, see the Ultralytics YOLO26 Docs.
FAQ#
To deploy Ultralytics YOLO26 on NVIDIA Jetson devices, first flash your Jetson device with the NVIDIA JetPack SDK. Then, either use a pre-built Docker image for quick setup or manually install the required packages.
YOLO26 models have been benchmarked on NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor, AGX Orin, Orin Nano Super, and Orin NX devices, and the TensorRT format delivers the best inference performance. The Detailed Comparison Tables section lists mAP50-95 and inference time for each model and export format.
TensorRT is recommended for deploying YOLO26 models on NVIDIA Jetson because it delivers the fastest inference of all export formats by optimizing the model for the Jetson's GPU.
To install PyTorch and Torchvision on NVIDIA Jetson, first uninstall any existing versions that may have been installed via pip. Then, manually install the compatible PyTorch and Torchvision versions for the Jetson's ARM64 architecture. Detailed instructions for this process are provided in the Install PyTorch and Torchvision section.
To maximize performance on NVIDIA Jetson with YOLO26, follow these best practices:
- Enable MAX Power Mode to utilize all CPU and GPU cores.
- Enable Jetson Clocks to run all cores at their maximum frequency.
- Install the Jetson Stats application for monitoring system metrics.
For commands and additional details, refer to the Best Practices when using NVIDIA Jetson section.
Available RAM is often the bottleneck on lower-memory Jetson devices. Three easy wins that together can recover over 1 GB:
- Switch to headless boot (
sudo systemctl set-default multi-user.target) to eliminate the desktop GUI (~865 MB saved). - Disable unused services such as Bluetooth or connectivity managers (~32 MB saved).
- Run inference without a display by setting
show=Falsein your YOLOpredictcall, which avoids allocating display pipeline memory (~200+ MB saved).
Use
procrankto profile per-process RAM usage andsudo cat /sys/kernel/debug/nvmap/iovmm/clientsto inspect GPU allocations. See the Memory Optimization Tips section for full details.- Switch to headless boot (
TensorRT 10.3.0 shipped with JetPack 6 has a known issue that prevents building INT8 engines with NMS-free (
nms=False) or embedded NMS (nms=True) outputs. When Ultralytics detects this combination, it selects the one-to-many head for NMS-free exports and stopsnms=Trueexports with an error.To restore these INT8 exports, upgrade TensorRT to a newer version (e.g., 10.7.0+):
wget https://developer.download.nvidia.com/compute/cuda/repos/ubuntu2204/arm64/cuda-keyring_1.1-1_all.deb sudo dpkg -i cuda-keyring_1.1-1_all.deb sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install -y tensorrtAfter upgrading, re-run your export. For more details, see GitHub issue #23841 and issue #26655.
Comments194
Ask a question, share your results, or help someone else.
LG973641114
您好,如何用c++在jetson上部署YOLO26,有相关例子吗
1pknowler
Struggling with this on a new Jetson Orin Nano JP6.1. All good following the steps and installs to give torch.cuda.is_available as TRUE. The TensorRT export fails though with a number of dependency errors and I can’t re-install it with anything. Any pointers please?
1
Glenn JocherUltralytics@pknowler it seems like the dependency errors during TensorRT export might stem from compatibility issues. Please ensure you’ve installed the required JetPack-compatible versions of PyTorch, Torchvision, and TensorRT as outlined in the Jetson Quick Start Guide. Additionally, verify that
onnxruntime-gpuandcuSPARSELtare correctly installed per the guide. If the issue persists, you can try reinstalling TensorRT using the NVIDIA SDK Manager for your JetPack version. Let me know if you need further clarification!pknowler
Thank you. I will try again working through all of the steps and let you know how it goes!
pknowler
I’ve tried again but this as far as I get… I have followed everything carefully.
WARNING ⚠️ TensorRT requires GPU export, automatically assigning device=0 Ultralytics 8.3.57 🚀 Python-3.10.16 torch-2.5.0a0+872d972e41.nv24.08 CUDA:0 (Orin, 7620MiB) YOLO11n summary (fused): 238 layers, 2,616,248 parameters, 0 gradients, 6.5 GFLOPs
PyTorch: starting from 'yolo11n.pt' with input shape (1, 3, 640, 640) BCHW and output shape(s) (1, 84, 8400) (5.4 MB)
ONNX: starting export with onnx 1.17.0 opset 19... ONNX: slimming with onnxslim 0.1.46... ONNX: export success ✅ 3.1s, saved as 'yolo11n.onnx' (10.2 MB) requirements: Ultralytics requirement ['tensorrt>7.0.0,!=10.1.0'] not found, attempting AutoUpdate... error: subprocess-exited-with-error
× python setup.py egg_info did not run successfully. │ exit code: 1 ╰─> [6 lines of output] Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 2, in File "", line 34, in File "/tmp/pip-install-d0ljzl60/tensorrt-cu12_db0552ac431148489703f6f75df6764f/setup.py", line 71, in raise RuntimeError("TensorRT does not currently build wheels for Tegra systems") RuntimeError: TensorRT does not currently build wheels for Tegra systems [end of output]
note: This error originates from a subprocess, and is likely not a problem with pip. error: metadata-generation-failed
× Encountered error while generating package metadata. ╰─> See above for output.
note: This is an issue with the package mentioned above, not pip. hint: See above for details. Retry 1/2 failed: Command 'pip install --no-cache-dir "tensorrt>7.0.0,!=10.1.0" ' returned non-zero exit status 1. error: subprocess-exited-with-error
× python setup.py egg_info did not run successfully. │ exit code: 1 ╰─> [6 lines of output] Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 2, in File "", line 34, in File "/tmp/pip-install-782zjqf9/tensorrt-cu12_44d261aea7c5489db3e9ce15cec8ee64/setup.py", line 71, in raise RuntimeError("TensorRT does not currently build wheels for Tegra systems") RuntimeError: TensorRT does not currently build wheels for Tegra systems [end of output]
note: This error originates from a subprocess, and is likely not a problem with pip. error: metadata-generation-failed
× Encountered error while generating package metadata. ╰─> See above for output.
note: This is an issue with the package mentioned above, not pip. hint: See above for details.
pknowler
And I have TensorRT 10.7.0.23-1+cuda12.6
Glenn JocherUltralytics@pknowler it seems your TensorRT version is not compatible with the Jetson's ARM64 architecture. TensorRT does not provide pre-built Python wheels for Tegra systems. Please ensure you have TensorRT installed via the NVIDIA SDK Manager as part of the JetPack installation, and confirm compatibility with your JetPack version. The Jetson Quick Start Guide might also help clarify setup specifics. Let me know if further assistance is needed!
pknowler
@glenn-jocher thank you. I have found the issue now. I am using miniconda and for some reason TensorRT Python bindings are not available in conda envs. So I can import Torch with no problem but the import TensorRT fails. I have re-installed without conda and all works as expected! 👍🏻
RasoulZardeyni
Which one reduce inference time using TensorRT or deepstream?
1
Paula DerrengerUltralytics(edited)In terms of reducing inference time on your NVIDIA Jetson device, using TensorRT is generally recommended. TensorRT is specifically designed to provide high performance for NVIDIA hardware by optimizing deep learning models for inference. It accelerates models by fusing layers, pruning unused layers, and quantizing variables, among other optimizations. 🚀
DeepStream, on the other hand, is more focused on streaming analytics and can utilize TensorRT-optimized models. For most cases, directly using TensorRT for model optimization is your go-to for minimizing inference times.
Here's a quick example of exporting a YOLO model to TensorRT and running inference, tailored for your convenience:
from ultralytics import YOLO # Load your YOLO model model = YOLO('yolo26n.pt') # Export to TensorRT format model.export(format='engine') # Load the TensorRT model trt_model = YOLO('yolo26n.engine') # Run inference using the TensorRT model results = trt_model('your_image_or_video.jpg')Feel free to explore more about deploying on NVIDIA Jetson with our Quick Start Guide for NVIDIA Jetson. Happy inferencing! 🌟
2RasoulZardeyni
Thanks!
1
Paula DerrengerUltralytics(edited)Hey there! 😊 It looks like you're interested in speeding up your inference times. Between TensorRT and DeepStream on NVIDIA Jetson devices, TensorRT typically offers more direct optimization for reducing inference time for individual models by providing lower-level optimizations and quantization options.
DeepStream is a comprehensive framework for building end-to-end video analytics applications, which utilizes TensorRT under the hood for model inference. DeepStream excels in scenarios involving video streams, multi-stream input, and complex pipelines involving multiple AI models and analytics. If your primary goal is solely to minimize inference time for a specific model, direct optimization via TensorRT can provide more focused improvements.
A quick example of exporting a YOLO model to TensorRT:
from ultralytics import YOLO # Load your YOLO model model = YOLO('yolo26n.pt') # Export to TensorRT format model.export(format='engine') # This creates 'yolo26n.engine' # Done! Now you can use 'yolo26n.engine' for faster inference.However, if your application benefits from a broader video analytics pipeline, incorporating DeepStream into your workflow can optimize and streamline these processes on top of efficiently handling inference with TensorRT optimized models. 🚀
Hope this gives you a clearer picture! If you have more questions, feel free to ask.
1
Yufeng Wu(edited)Hi, ultralytics team. I'm trying yolo26n-pose on Jetson orin agx 64gb and have this problem: I tried building engine with dynamic=true but failed, with the log saying ForeignNode[/model.23/Sigmoid.../model.23/Flatten] (Myelin) Skipping tactic ... Incompatible effective shapes in operation /model_23/Sub between: Unsqueeze_18_output_0 f32[1,2,33600] and Slice_output_0 f32[1,2,21504] Could not find any implementation for node {ForeignNode[/model.23/Sigmoid.../model.23/Flatten]} Is there a way to fix it?
Glenn JocherUltralyticsThis indicates a TensorRT dynamic-shape profile failure in the pose head. As a workaround, export a fixed-resolution engine, e.g.
yolo export model=yolo26n-pose.pt format=engine imgsz=640 batch=1 dynamic=False; build separate engines if multiple resolutions are required. If dynamic shapes are essential, please open a new issue with the full text log,yolo checksoutput, and JetPack/TensorRT/Ultralytics versions so we can reproduce it; see the TensorRT export guide.
Haotian Gong(edited)Hi, everyone,
I'd like to flag two issues with the Jetson installation guide that may need updating.
1. PyTorch 2.10.0 / Torchvision 0.25.0 doesn't work on JetPack 6.1
Following the "Start with naive installation" and "Run on JetPack 6.1" sections, I installed Pytorch 2.10.0 and Torchvision 0.25.0 as instructed.
Running my script then throws:
ImportError: libcublas.so.13: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directorySo I have to install Pytorch 2.8.0 with the guide:
https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/jetson-orin-nano-issues-running-yolo-ultralytics-due-to-pytorch-torchvision-compatibility-jetpack-6-x-cuda-12-6/365683/9And this version of Pytorch works. So maybe is the guide on Jetson obsolete or mistaken?
2. CSI camera requires the JetPack-bundled OpenCV, not the PyPI one
On Jetson, using a CSI camera (via
nvarguscamerasrc) requires the OpenCV that ships with JetPack, because the PyPIopencv-pythonwheel on aarch64 is built without GStreamer support.However,
pip install ultralyticspulls inopencv-pythonas a dependency, which shadows the JetPack-bundled version and silently breaks CSI camera pipelines.pip uninstall -y opencv-python opencv-python-headless sudo apt install -y python3-opencv # JetPack-bundled OpenCV with GStreamerThanks!
Lakshantha DissanayakeUltralyticsHi @ZephyrKeXiner Could you please double check whether you are using JetPack 6.1 system with CUDA 12.6? I have just verified on my JetPack 6.1 system with CUDA 12.6 with
torch-2.10.0andtorchvision-0.25.0as mentioned in the Ultralytics Jetson Guide and it works well.For JetPack 6.1, output of
cat /etc/nv_tegra_releaseshould look like below:(env) nvidia@ubuntu:~/yolo26/ultralytics$ cat /etc/nv_tegra_release # R36 (release), REVISION: 4.3, GCID: 38968081, BOARD: generic, EABI: aarch64, DATE: Wed Jan 8 01:49:37 UTC 2025 # KERNEL_VARIANT: oot TARGET_USERSPACE_LIB_DIR=nvidia TARGET_USERSPACE_LIB_DIR_PATH=usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/nvidiaCould you also share yours please? Thanks!
cc: @raimbekovm
1
Haotian GongHi @lakshanthad,
My output of
cat /etc/nv_tegra_releaseis below:$ cat /etc/nv_tegra_release # R36 (release), REVISION: 5.0, GCID: 43688277, BOARD: generic, EABI: aarch64, DATE: Fri Jan 16 03:50:45 UTC 2026 # KERNEL_VARIANT: oot TARGET_USERSPACE_LIB_DIR=nvidia TARGET_USERSPACE_LIB_DIR_PATH=usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/nvidiaI notice that the revision is 5.0 not 4.3. Maybe does it cause the error?
smbunn(edited)
I would have thought the Jetson Orin Nano could do more than 5 streams, the deepstream examples with cars handles 16 streams of 1080p at what appears to be full framerate.
As a control systems engineer by training, edge devices seem a much better way to go so I prefer your jetson design. Even if one Jetson has an issue you are still processing 45 streams whereas a problem on your centralised server in option 2 takes everything down.
Are you going to set up an MQTT feed for alerts from each stream? Maybe consider secondary processing and a buffer, so the edge device detects what it thinks is an issue and a centralised server grabs 5 seconds of video of the incident and double checks.
Simon BUNN
General
From: Yash Patel @.> Sent: Friday, 22 May 2026 4:00 am To: ultralytics/ultralytics @.> Cc: Bunn, Simon @.>; Mention @.> Subject: Re: [ultralytics/ultralytics] guides/nvidia-jetson/ (Discussion #9942)
Hi, I am designing an AI-based CCTV surveillance system for a residential society with 50 RTSP camera streams. My current architecture uses multiple NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super Developer Kit devices for distributed inference processing. I ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart Attention The sender's identity could not be verified and someone may be impersonating the sender. L'identité de l'expéditeur n'a pas pu être vérifiée et quelqu'un pourrait se faire passer pour l'expéditeur.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Hi, I am designing an AI-based CCTV surveillance system for a residential society with 50 RTSP camera streams. My current architecture uses multiple NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super Developer Kit devices for distributed inference processing. I estimate that one Jetson Orin Nano Super (8GB) can process around 5 RTSP streams at usable real-time FPS. This requires approximately 10 Jetson devices for the full deployment. Each device costs around ₹33,000 (~USD 395). The total estimated hardware cost is ₹330,000 (~USD 3,950). I want to compare this setup against a centralized Linux-based custom PC/server with NVIDIA GPU acceleration under the same budget. The comparison focuses on AI inference performance, scalability, reliability, and 24/7 operational efficiency. The workload mainly includes multi-stream YOLO/object detection inference on live RTSP feeds. I want to determine which architecture provides the best computation-to-cost ratio for this surveillance use case.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/orgs/ultralytics/discussions/9942*discussioncomment-17006943__;Iw!!ElGdukoduuk!URiPjKkgDoMT_k2Y6pEd3XMEBGMDjhwgtQmwWXR9F4R4L7ymNloZD79NanOjYVg9YYmaARqyZGbgFv7U15KzgdcU$, or unsubscribehttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABAAMILYUP7PPODNHDR3HC3434RYLAVCNFSM6AAAAABGAK2IGGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTOMBQGY4TIMY__;!!ElGdukoduuk!URiPjKkgDoMT_k2Y6pEd3XMEBGMDjhwgtQmwWXR9F4R4L7ymNloZD79NanOjYVg9YYmaARqyZGbgFv7U1zjhi4YU$. Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOShttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675__;!!ElGdukoduuk!URiPjKkgDoMT_k2Y6pEd3XMEBGMDjhwgtQmwWXR9F4R4L7ymNloZD79NanOjYVg9YYmaARqyZGbgFv7U13gOq1qb$ or Androidhttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign*3Dnotification-email*26utm_medium*3Demail*26utm_source*3Dgithub__;JSUlJSU!!ElGdukoduuk!URiPjKkgDoMT_k2Y6pEd3XMEBGMDjhwgtQmwWXR9F4R4L7ymNloZD79NanOjYVg9YYmaARqyZGbgFv7U1zOl3XaF$. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Glenn JocherUltralytics5streams on an Orin Nano Super is just a conservative YOLO/Python estimate; with a headless TensorRT or DeepStream pipeline, MAX power mode, andjetson_clocks, higher 1080p stream counts are definitely possible and depend heavily on the model size, input resolution, decode/encode, and any tracking or alert logic you add, so please drop your exactmodel,imgsz, FPS target, and RTSP resolution here and we can help size it more accurately using the Jetson deployment guide and DeepStream Jetson guide.
yashpatel2010
Hi, I am designing an AI-based CCTV surveillance system for a residential society with 50 RTSP camera streams. My current architecture uses multiple NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super Developer Kit devices for distributed inference processing. I estimate that one Jetson Orin Nano Super (8GB) can process around 5 RTSP streams at usable real-time FPS. This requires approximately 10 Jetson devices for the full deployment. Each device costs around ₹33,000 (~USD 395). The total estimated hardware cost is ₹330,000 (~USD 3,950). I want to compare this setup against a centralized Linux-based custom PC/server with NVIDIA GPU acceleration under the same budget. The comparison focuses on AI inference performance, scalability, reliability, and 24/7 operational efficiency. The workload mainly includes multi-stream YOLO/object detection inference on live RTSP feeds. I want to determine which architecture provides the best computation-to-cost ratio for this surveillance use case.
RotatingGiraffe
Hi there, I am trying to run a fine-tuned YOLO26 based model for an OBB task on a Xavier NX running JetPack 5. I am using your container (ultralytics/ultralytics:latest-jetson-jetpack5) and trying to compile from PyTorch to TensorRT. I get the error: "mymodel.pt requires numpy>=1.26.1, however numpy==1.23.5 is installed."
Previously I have successfully the file on my host machine from PT to ONNX, copied ONNX to Jetson and then used tensorrtexec to compile to Engine. But the resulting models did not create any bounding boxes.
I wanted to ask if JetPack 5 even supports Yolo26 or if the model contains some incompatible layers? YOLO11 OBB works fine which I find extra-weird. Or is there likely an error somewhere else in my script?
Glenn JocherUltralyticsThanks for posting this here—JetPack 5 on Xavier NX is supported for YOLO26/TensorRT in our Jetson guide, so the
numpy>=1.26.1error points more to an environment/checkpoint mismatch than unsupported OBB layers; please paste the full text traceback andyolo checksoutput, and note that an engine built withtensorrtexeccan still produce empty OBB results if the Ultralytics export metadata/postprocessing is not preserved.RotatingGiraffe
Hi there, I tried to create a minimal reproducible example for you, based on what I am doing. I hope it helps with debugging.
The yolo checks you asked for is in the script output, along with the export script. I've also included the bit where I export via trtexex just for the sake of completion - it might very well be possible that I omit required metadata with this. My prefered goal would be that everything works via the Ultralytics Python API, but I had to search for workaround due to the NumPy error when compiling PT files.
I am now using the Ultralytics base image in the MRE which I hoped would be easier to debug for us. The NumPy error persists on the new image. Previously I was using something built upon l4t-ml.
Additionally, ONNX fails with an error ( `GLIBCXX_3.4.29' not found I think it was) but that is not a concern to me since I engine would be my prefered way to go. I have not installed any additional packages and kept it very vanilla (see dockerfile). The MRE also weirdly produced a new error during engine inference, but I'd say lets just focus on getting the Ultralytics native pipeline to work and then maybe all the other issues were just from my workarounds and disappear.
Execution Command
sudo docker compose up --buildDirectory Structure
obb-test-repro/ ┣ 📂data/ ┃ ┗ 📜mydataset.yaml ┣ 📂models/ ┃ ┣ 📜my-yolo26m-model.onnx ┃ ┗ 📜my-yolo26m-model.pt ┣ 📂src/ ┃ ┗ 📜main.py ┣ 📜docker-compose.yml ┣ 📜Dockerfile ┗ 📜requirements.txtDockerfile
FROM ultralytics/ultralytics:latest-jetson-jetpack5 WORKDIR /app # Copy the test app COPY src/ ./src/ # Run the test CMD ["python3", "src/main.py"]docker-compose.yml
version: '3.8' services: obb-test-jp5: image: obb-test:latest container_name: obb_test_jp5 build: context: . dockerfile: Dockerfile runtime: nvidia network_mode: host ipc: host restart: "no" volumes: - ./models:/app/models - ./data:/app/data environment: - NVIDIA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=all - NVIDIA_DRIVER_CAPABILITIES=allmain.py
""" Minimal OBB model test script. Behavior: - Runs `yolo checks` to output environment details. - Uses files in `/app/models` (container path mapped from `obb-test/models`). - Expects two files (hard-coded): - `/app/models/my-yolo26m-model.pt` (optional) — used for Ultralytics native export - `/app/models/my-yolo26m-model.onnx` (optional) — used for trtexec compilation - Runs both export methods (if files exist) and validates inference on each compiled engine using mydataset dataset. """ import logging import sys import subprocess import os from pathlib import Path from ultralytics import YOLO # Configure logging logging.basicConfig( level=logging.INFO, format='%(asctime)s - %(levelname)s - %(message)s' ) logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) def run_yolo_checks(): """Execute yolo checks via CLI to log environment details.""" logger.info("=" * 60) logger.info("Environment Verification (yolo checks)") logger.info("=" * 60) try: res = subprocess.run(["yolo", "checks"], capture_output=True, text=True, check=True) logger.info("\n" + res.stdout.strip()) except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e: logger.error(f"yolo checks failed:\n{e.stderr}") except FileNotFoundError: logger.error("yolo CLI command not found. Ensure ultralytics is installed in this environment.") def test_export_to_engine(): models_dir = Path("/app/models") pt_path = models_dir / "my-yolo26m-model.pt" onnx_path = models_dir / "my-yolo26m-model.onnx" dataset_yaml = "/app/data/mydataset.yaml" logger.info("=" * 60) logger.info("Minimal OBB Test - Export & Validation") logger.info("=" * 60) engines_tested = [] # Part 1: Ultralytics native export (PT -> Engine) if pt_path.exists(): try: logger.info(f"\nRunning Ultralytics native export for: {pt_path.name}") model = YOLO(str(pt_path)) exported = model.export(format="engine", imgsz=1024, device=0, half=True) # Resolve the exported engine path native_engine = str(exported) if isinstance(exported, (str, Path)) else str(pt_path.with_suffix('.engine')) if os.path.exists(native_engine): logger.info(f"Ultralytics export successfully produced: {native_engine}") engines_tested.append(native_engine) else: logger.error(f"Ultralytics export completed, but engine file was not found at {native_engine}") except Exception as e: logger.error(f"Ultralytics native export failed: {e}", exc_info=True) else: logger.info(f"PT file not found ({pt_path}); skipping Ultralytics native export.") # Part 2: trtexec compilation (ONNX -> Engine) if onnx_path.exists(): try: logger.info(f"\nRunning trtexec to compile ONNX: {onnx_path.name}") trt_engine = str(onnx_path.with_suffix('.trt.engine')) cmd = [ "/usr/src/tensorrt/bin/trtexec", f"--onnx={onnx_path}", f"--saveEngine={trt_engine}", "--fp16", "--memPoolSize=workspace:768", # Prevents Out of Memory ] logger.info(f"Running command: {' '.join(cmd)}") res = subprocess.run(cmd, capture_output=True, text=True) if res.returncode != 0: logger.error("trtexec compilation failed.") logger.error(f"trtexec stderr:\n{res.stderr}") else: if os.path.exists(trt_engine): logger.info(f"trtexec successfully saved engine to {trt_engine}") engines_tested.append(trt_engine) else: logger.error(f"trtexec returned success, but engine file was not found at {trt_engine}") except Exception as e: logger.error(f"trtexec execution failed: {e}", exc_info=True) else: logger.info(f"ONNX file not found ({onnx_path}); skipping trtexec compilation.") if not engines_tested: logger.error("\nNo engines are available to test. Exiting validation phase.") return False # Part 3: Inference Validation validation_success = True for eng in engines_tested: try: logger.info(f"\nValidating inference with engine: {eng}") model = YOLO(eng, task="obb") metrics = model.val(data=dataset_yaml, imgsz=1024, batch=1, verbose=False) logger.info(f"Validation metrics for {eng}: mAP50-95={metrics.box.map:.4f}, mAP50={metrics.box.map50:.4f}") except Exception as e: logger.error(f"Validation failed on {eng}: {e}", exc_info=True) validation_success = False logger.info("\nExecution complete.") return validation_success if __name__ == "__main__": run_yolo_checks() try: success = test_export_to_engine() logger.info("\n" + "=" * 60) if success: logger.info("✓ Test passed") else: logger.info("✗ Test failed") logger.info("=" * 60) sys.exit(0 if success else 1) except Exception as e: logger.error(f"Unhandled script exception: {e}", exc_info=True) sys.exit(1)Output
obb_test_jp5 | Creating new Ultralytics Settings v0.0.6 file ✅ obb_test_jp5 | View Ultralytics Settings with 'yolo settings' or at '/root/.config/Ultralytics/settings.json' obb_test_jp5 | Update Settings with 'yolo settings key=value', i.e. 'yolo settings runs_dir=path/to/dir'. For help see https://docs.ultralytics.com/quickstart/#ultralytics-settings. obb_test_jp5 | 2026-05-14 12:51:35,392 - INFO - ============================================================ obb_test_jp5 | 2026-05-14 12:51:35,392 - INFO - Environment Verification (yolo checks) obb_test_jp5 | 2026-05-14 12:51:35,392 - INFO - ============================================================ obb_test_jp5 | 2026-05-14 12:51:50,554 - INFO - obb_test_jp5 | Ultralytics 8.4.50 🚀 Python-3.8.10 torch-2.1.0a0+41361538.nv23.06 CUDA:0 (Xavier, 6833MiB) obb_test_jp5 | Setup complete ✅ (2 CPUs, 6.7 GB RAM, 91.7/107.6 GB disk) obb_test_jp5 | obb_test_jp5 | OS Linux-5.10.216-tegra-aarch64-with-glibc2.29 obb_test_jp5 | Environment Docker obb_test_jp5 | Python 3.8.10 obb_test_jp5 | Install git obb_test_jp5 | Path /ultralytics/ultralytics obb_test_jp5 | RAM 6.67 GB obb_test_jp5 | Disk 91.7/107.6 GB obb_test_jp5 | CPU ARMv8 Processor rev 0 (v8l) obb_test_jp5 | CPU count 2 obb_test_jp5 | GPU Xavier, 6833MiB obb_test_jp5 | GPU count 1 obb_test_jp5 | CUDA 11.4 obb_test_jp5 | obb_test_jp5 | numpy ✅ 1.23.5>=1.23.0 obb_test_jp5 | matplotlib ✅ 3.7.5>=3.3.0 obb_test_jp5 | opencv-python-headless ✅ 4.13.0.92>=4.6.0 obb_test_jp5 | pillow ✅ 10.4.0>=7.1.2 obb_test_jp5 | pyyaml ✅ 6.0.3>=5.3.1 obb_test_jp5 | requests ✅ 2.32.4>=2.23.0 obb_test_jp5 | scipy ✅ 1.10.1>=1.4.1 obb_test_jp5 | torch ✅ 2.1.0a0+41361538.nv23.6>=1.8.0 obb_test_jp5 | torchvision ✅ 0.16.2+c6f3977>=0.9.0 obb_test_jp5 | psutil ✅ 7.2.2>=5.8.0 obb_test_jp5 | polars ✅ 1.8.2>=0.20.0 obb_test_jp5 | ultralytics-thop ✅ 2.0.19>=2.0.18 obb_test_jp5 | torch ✅ 2.1.0a0+41361538.nv23.6!=2.4.0,>=1.8.0; sys_platform == "win32" obb_test_jp5 | 2026-05-14 12:51:50,562 - INFO - ============================================================ obb_test_jp5 | 2026-05-14 12:51:50,563 - INFO - Minimal OBB Test - Export & Validation obb_test_jp5 | 2026-05-14 12:51:50,564 - INFO - ============================================================ obb_test_jp5 | 2026-05-14 12:51:50,565 - INFO - obb_test_jp5 | Running Ultralytics native export for: my-yolo26m-model.pt obb_test_jp5 | 2026-05-14 12:51:51,353 - ERROR - Ultralytics native export failed: ERROR ❌️ /app/models/my-yolo26m-model.pt requires numpy>=1.26.1, however numpy==1.23.5 is installed. obb_test_jp5 | Traceback (most recent call last): obb_test_jp5 | File "/ultralytics/ultralytics/nn/tasks.py", line 1466, in torch_safe_load obb_test_jp5 | ckpt = _load() obb_test_jp5 | File "/ultralytics/ultralytics/nn/tasks.py", line 1463, in _load obb_test_jp5 | return torch_load(file, map_location="cpu") obb_test_jp5 | File "/ultralytics/ultralytics/utils/patches.py", line 181, in torch_load obb_test_jp5 | return torch.load(*args, **kwargs) obb_test_jp5 | File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages/torch/serialization.py", line 877, in load obb_test_jp5 | return _load(opened_zipfile, map_location, pickle_module, **pickle_load_args) obb_test_jp5 | File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages/torch/serialization.py", line 1253, in _load obb_test_jp5 | result = unpickler.load() obb_test_jp5 | File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages/torch/serialization.py", line 1246, in find_class obb_test_jp5 | return super().find_class(mod_name, name) obb_test_jp5 | ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'numpy._core' obb_test_jp5 | obb_test_jp5 | The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception: obb_test_jp5 | obb_test_jp5 | Traceback (most recent call last): obb_test_jp5 | File "src/minimal.py", line 58, in test_export_to_engine obb_test_jp5 | model = YOLO(str(pt_path)) obb_test_jp5 | File "/ultralytics/ultralytics/models/yolo/model.py", line 76, in __init__ obb_test_jp5 | super().__init__(model=model, task=task, verbose=verbose) obb_test_jp5 | File "/ultralytics/ultralytics/engine/model.py", line 144, in __init__ obb_test_jp5 | self._load(model, task=task) obb_test_jp5 | File "/ultralytics/ultralytics/engine/model.py", line 283, in _load obb_test_jp5 | self.model, self.ckpt = load_checkpoint(weights) obb_test_jp5 | File "/ultralytics/ultralytics/nn/tasks.py", line 1537, in load_checkpoint obb_test_jp5 | ckpt, weight = torch_safe_load(weight) # load ckpt obb_test_jp5 | File "/ultralytics/ultralytics/nn/tasks.py", line 1489, in torch_safe_load obb_test_jp5 | raise ModuleNotFoundError( obb_test_jp5 | ModuleNotFoundError: ERROR ❌️ /app/models/my-yolo26m-model.pt requires numpy>=1.26.1, however numpy==1.23.5 is installed. obb_test_jp5 | 2026-05-14 12:51:51,382 - INFO - obb_test_jp5 | Running trtexec to compile ONNX: my-yolo26m-model.onnx obb_test_jp5 | 2026-05-14 12:51:51,382 - INFO - Running command: /usr/src/tensorrt/bin/trtexec --onnx=/app/models/my-yolo26m-model.onnx --saveEngine=/app/models/my-yolo26m-model.trt.engine --fp16 --memPoolSize=workspace:768 obb_test_jp5 | 2026-05-14 13:21:39,214 - INFO - trtexec successfully saved engine to /app/models/my-yolo26m-model.trt.engine obb_test_jp5 | 2026-05-14 13:21:39,217 - INFO - obb_test_jp5 | Validating inference with engine: /app/models/my-yolo26m-model.trt.engine obb_test_jp5 | Ultralytics 8.4.50 🚀 Python-3.8.10 torch-2.1.0a0+41361538.nv23.06 CUDA:0 (Xavier, 6833MiB) obb_test_jp5 | Loading /app/models/my-yolo26m-model.trt.engine for TensorRT inference... obb_test_jp5 | [05/14/2026-13:21:41] [TRT] [I] Loaded engine size: 43 MiB obb_test_jp5 | [05/14/2026-13:21:45] [TRT] [I] [MemUsageChange] Init cuBLAS/cuBLASLt: CPU +260, GPU +306, now: CPU 648, GPU 5277 (MiB) obb_test_jp5 | [05/14/2026-13:21:46] [TRT] [I] [MemUsageChange] Init cuDNN: CPU +82, GPU +156, now: CPU 730, GPU 5433 (MiB) obb_test_jp5 | [05/14/2026-13:21:46] [TRT] [I] [MemUsageChange] TensorRT-managed allocation in engine deserialization: CPU +0, GPU +41, now: CPU 0, GPU 41 (MiB) obb_test_jp5 | [05/14/2026-13:21:46] [TRT] [I] [MemUsageChange] Init cuBLAS/cuBLASLt: CPU +0, GPU +28, now: CPU 687, GPU 5422 (MiB) obb_test_jp5 | [05/14/2026-13:21:46] [TRT] [I] [MemUsageChange] Init cuDNN: CPU +0, GPU +32, now: CPU 687, GPU 5454 (MiB) obb_test_jp5 | [05/14/2026-13:21:46] [TRT] [I] [MemUsageChange] TensorRT-managed allocation in IExecutionContext creation: CPU +0, GPU +92, now: CPU 0, GPU 133 (MiB) obb_test_jp5 | Setting batch=1 input of shape (1, 3, 1024, 1024) obb_test_jp5 | 2026-05-14 13:21:54,562 - INFO - generated new fontManager obb_test_jp5 | val: Fast image access ✅ (ping: 1.1±0.9 ms, read: 479.2±146.1 MB/s, size: 2563.4 KB) val: Scanning /app/data/labels/rec26.cache... 2940 images, 26 backgrounds, 0 corrupt: 100% ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 2940/2940 14.4Mit/s 0.0s obb_test_jp5 | 2026-05-14 13:22:01,033 - ERROR - Validation failed on /app/models/my-yolo26m-model.trt.engine: CUDA error: no kernel image is available for execution on the device obb_test_jp5 | CUDA kernel errors might be asynchronously reported at some other API call, so the stacktrace below might be incorrect. obb_test_jp5 | For debugging consider passing CUDA_LAUNCH_BLOCKING=1. obb_test_jp5 | Compile with `TORCH_USE_CUDA_DSA` to enable device-side assertions. obb_test_jp5 | Traceback (most recent call last): obb_test_jp5 | File "src/minimal.py", line 114, in test_export_to_engine obb_test_jp5 | metrics = model.val(data=dataset_yaml, imgsz=1024, batch=1, verbose=False) obb_test_jp5 | File "/ultralytics/ultralytics/engine/model.py", line 615, in val obb_test_jp5 | validator(model=self.model) obb_test_jp5 | File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages/torch/utils/_contextlib.py", line 115, in decorate_context obb_test_jp5 | return func(*args, **kwargs) obb_test_jp5 | File "/ultralytics/ultralytics/engine/validator.py", line 210, in __call__ obb_test_jp5 | model.warmup(imgsz=(1 if pt else self.args.batch, self.data["channels"], imgsz, imgsz)) # warmup obb_test_jp5 | File "/ultralytics/ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py", line 313, in warmup obb_test_jp5 | non_max_suppression(warmup_boxes) # warmup NMS obb_test_jp5 | File "/ultralytics/ultralytics/utils/nms.py", line 154, in non_max_suppression obb_test_jp5 | i = torchvision.ops.nms(boxes, scores, iou_thres) obb_test_jp5 | File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages/torchvision/ops/boxes.py", line 41, in nms obb_test_jp5 | return torch.ops.torchvision.nms(boxes, scores, iou_threshold) obb_test_jp5 | File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages/torch/_ops.py", line 646, in __call__ obb_test_jp5 | return self._op(*args, **kwargs or {}) obb_test_jp5 | RuntimeError: CUDA error: no kernel image is available for execution on the device obb_test_jp5 | CUDA kernel errors might be asynchronously reported at some other API call, so the stacktrace below might be incorrect. obb_test_jp5 | For debugging consider passing CUDA_LAUNCH_BLOCKING=1. obb_test_jp5 | Compile with `TORCH_USE_CUDA_DSA` to enable device-side assertions. obb_test_jp5 | obb_test_jp5 | 2026-05-14 13:22:01,521 - INFO - obb_test_jp5 | Execution complete. obb_test_jp5 | 2026-05-14 13:22:01,524 - INFO - obb_test_jp5 | ============================================================ obb_test_jp5 | 2026-05-14 13:22:01,526 - INFO - ✗ Test failed obb_test_jp5 | 2026-05-14 13:22:01,529 - INFO - ============================================================ obb_test_jp5 exited with code 1Export Device
This is a bit of info on where my ONNX files come from and what my PC environment looks like where I compiled them.
Yolo Checks on the ONNX Export Device
Ultralytics 8.4.48 🚀 Python-3.13.9 torch-2.11.0+cu130 CPU (AMD Ryzen 5 5600G with Radeon Graphics) Setup complete ✅ (12 CPUs, 15.0 GB RAM, 744.1/878.1 GB disk) OS Linux-6.17.0-23-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.39 Environment Linux Python 3.13.9 Install git Path /home/myuser/projects/myproject/.venv/lib/python3.13/site-packages/ultralytics RAM 15.01 GB Disk 744.1/878.1 GB CPU AMD Ryzen 5 5600G with Radeon Graphics CPU count 12 GPU None GPU count None CUDA None numpy ✅ 2.4.4>=1.23.0 matplotlib ✅ 3.10.9>=3.3.0 opencv-python ✅ 4.13.0.92>=4.6.0 pillow ✅ 12.2.0>=7.1.2 pyyaml ✅ 6.0.3>=5.3.1 requests ✅ 2.33.1>=2.23.0 scipy ✅ 1.17.1>=1.4.1 torch ✅ 2.11.0>=1.8.0 torch ✅ 2.11.0!=2.4.0,>=1.8.0; sys_platform == "win32" torchvision ✅ 0.26.0>=0.9.0 psutil ✅ 7.2.2>=5.8.0 polars ✅ 1.40.1>=0.20.0 ultralytics-thop ✅ 2.0.19>=2.0.18Export Code
from ultralytics import YOLO # 1. Load the model weights model_path = "my-yolo26m-model.pt" model = YOLO(model_path) # 2. Export the model # Configured for OBB (Oriented Bounding Boxes) and legacy TensorRT compatibility success = model.export( format="onnx", imgsz=1024, # Target resolution opset=13, # ONNX operator set version, also tried 12 simplify=True, # I hoped this would help task="obb", half=False, # I tried this with True and False end2end=False # For legacy TensorRT support...? ) print(f"Export successful: {success}")YOLO26m-obb summary (fused): 175 layers, 23,443,236 parameters, 0 gradients, 71.5 GFLOPs PyTorch: starting from 'my-yolo26m-model.pt' with input shape (1, 3, 1024, 1024) BCHW and output shape(s) (1, 6, 21504) (90.8 MB) ONNX: starting export with onnx 1.21.0 opset 13... ONNX: slimming with onnxslim 0.1.93... ONNX: export success ✅ 2.5s, saved as 'my-yolo26m-model.onnx' (81.3 MB) Export complete (4.3s)Old Container
Jut in case it is relevant, this is the yolo checks of my self-made container which is based on l4t-ml.
root@xaviernx-desktop:/app# yolo checks WARNING ⚠️ user config directory '/root/.config/Ultralytics' is not writable, using '/tmp/Ultralytics'. Set YOLO_CONFIG_DIR to override. Creating new Ultralytics Settings v0.0.6 file ✅ View Ultralytics Settings with 'yolo settings' or at '/tmp/Ultralytics/settings.json' Update Settings with 'yolo settings key=value', i.e. 'yolo settings runs_dir=path/to/dir'. For help see https://docs.ultralytics.com/quickstart/#ultralytics-settings. Ultralytics 8.4.49 🚀 Python-3.8.10 torch-2.0.0+nv23.05 CUDA:0 (Xavier, 6833MiB) Setup complete ✅ (2 CPUs, 6.7 GB RAM, 84.9/107.6 GB disk) OS Linux-5.10.216-tegra-aarch64-with-glibc2.29 Environment Docker Python 3.8.10 Install pip Path /usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages/ultralytics RAM 6.67 GB Disk 84.9/107.6 GB CPU ARMv8 Processor rev 0 (v8l) CPU count 2 GPU Xavier, 6833MiB GPU count 1 CUDA 11.4 numpy ✅ 1.23.5>=1.23.0 matplotlib ✅ 3.7.5>=3.3.0 opencv-python ❌ (not installed)>=4.6.0 pillow ✅ 10.2.0>=7.1.2 pyyaml ✅ 5.3.1>=5.3.1 requests ✅ 2.32.4>=2.23.0 scipy ✅ 1.10.1>=1.4.1 torch ✅ 2.0.0+nv23.5>=1.8.0 torch ✅ 2.0.0+nv23.5!=2.4.0,>=1.8.0; sys_platform == "win32" torchvision ✅ 0.15.1a0+42759b1>=0.9.0 psutil ✅ 5.9.6>=5.8.0 polars ❌ (not installed)>=0.20.0 ultralytics-thop ❌ (not installed)>=2.0.18
Murat RaimbekovThanks for the detailed MRE. I reproduced the numpy failure end-to-end with
torch.save/torch.loadand have a verified fix. There are two independent issues here.1.
numpy._core/ "requires numpy>=1.26.1" — root cause and fixYour
.ptwas saved on your PC with numpy 2.x / Python 3.13, so the checkpoint pickle embeds the numpy-2numpy._coremodule path. JetPack 5 on Xavier NX runs Python 3.8, whose maximum numpy is 1.24.x, and Xavier cannot move to JetPack 6 (Orin-only). I verified that even numpy 1.26.x does not fully read such a checkpoint, so "upgrade numpy" is not a real option on JP5.The reliable fix is a small compatibility shim that aliases
numpy._coreto the legacynumpy.core, injected before the model is loaded. I confirmed this loads a numpy-2torch.savecheckpoint correctly under numpy 1.23.5 with the model and all fields intact. Put this at the very top of yourmain.py, beforefrom ultralytics import YOLO:import sys, numpy, numpy.core sys.modules["numpy._core"] = numpy.core for _s in ("multiarray", "numeric", "umath", "_multiarray_umath"): try: sys.modules[f"numpy._core.{_s}"] = __import__(f"numpy.core.{_s}", fromlist=[_s]) except Exception: passAlternatively, fix the checkpoint once on the PC (where numpy 2.x can read it) so the device never needs the shim — load it and re-save it after converting the auxiliary numpy fields, then copy the new
.ptto the Jetson.2. Empty boxes /
CUDA error: no kernel image is available for execution on the deviceThese are separate from numpy:
- The
trtexec-built engine produces no detections because a rawtrtexecengine carries none of the Ultralytics export metadata, so the OBB decoding/post-processing is never applied. Build the engine on the Jetson with Ultralytics directly from the.pt(after applying the shim above) so metadata is embedded:YOLO("model.pt").export(format="engine", imgsz=1024, half=True, device=0). no kernel image is availableis raised insidetorchvision.ops.nmson the GPU: the PyTorch/torchvision inultralytics/ultralytics:latest-jetson-jetpack5is built for Orin (SM 8.7), while Xavier NX is SM 7.2. That is exactly why YOLO11 OBB works in your older l4t-ml-based container (torch 2.0.0+nv23.5) but the official image fails. Recommended path: stay on the container that already works on your Xavier,pip install ultralytics opencv-python-headlessthere, and run the Ultralyticsexport(format="engine")+val()entirely on-device.
TL;DR: the numpy error is a pickle module-path mismatch from the numpy-2 export PC (fix with the shim above — verified), and the empty/CUDA errors are a raw-
trtexecmetadata loss plus a torch/torchvision build that doesn't target Xavier's SM 7.2.1- The
RotatingGiraffe
Hi there, thank you for the help! I just recently got around to trying out the shim and now everything works just fine, thank you for your help!
yashpatel2010
How to run deepstream for YOLO26 models in my jetson orin nano developer kit?
Is there any documentation for deepstream on jetson? I don't want any installation errors of version missmatch.
So give me any perfect guide link so that I will not miss anything while installation and run inference on live RTSP streams
githubwalt(edited)
Here you go: https://docs.ultralytics.com/guides/deepstream-nvidia-jetson/
Have a look in jtop (info) for your board compute capability (CUDA Arch BIN). If it's also 8.7, then see my posts here above to avoid problems with torch.
Glenn JocherUltralyticsAdding one detail for
Jetson Orin Nano: keep the versions paired asJetPack 6.1+DeepStream 7.1from the Jetson quick-start and NVIDIA DeepStream getting started; for live RTSP, set theuriindeepstream_app_config.txtto your stream, and if you hit any mismatch please post the full text traceback plusyolo checksoutput here so the team can help.yashpatel2010
Thanks for your reply. Just onemore doubt to clear. docker pull nvcr.io/nvidia/deepstream:7.1-triton-multiarch
if I use above docker container for my jetpack6.1 so it there is no issue of version missmatch of deepstream right?
is it works very well with Yolo26 deepstream settings which is showing in this doc? https://docs.ultralytics.com/guides/deepstream-nvidia-jetson/
what is your recommendation to run Multiple RTSP streams with deepstream with docker containers or without docker containers manual installation?
Glenn JocherUltralyticsYes,
nvcr.io/nvidia/deepstream:7.1-triton-multiarchis the correct DeepStream 7.1 Jetson container forJetPack 6.1, but it still depends on the host having the JetPack BSP and NVIDIA container runtime installed, so it lowers mismatch risk rather than removing it completely; for YOLO26 + RTSP, the DeepStream multi-stream section is the right reference, and I’d suggest native setup first since that’s the install path used in the guide, then move to Docker once your pipeline is stable. (docs.ultralytics.com)yashpatel2010(edited)
Thanks. For native setup Is it good to install deepstream 7.1 while installing jetpack6.1 only?
Glenn JocherUltralyticsYes—on
Jetson Orin Nanonative setup,JetPack 6.1+DeepStream 7.1is the correct pairing; installJetPack 6.1first, boot and verify the system, then installDeepStream 7.1separately using the versions listed in the Jetson + YOLO26 guide and the DeepStream on Jetson guide to avoid mismatches.
githubwalt
Installing torch 2.11.0 from the official website pytorch.org on an AGX Orin 64Gb (dev kit) with JP6.2.2 or installing torch 2.10.0 and torchvision 0.25.0 following this page, give complaints about not being compatible with the Compute Capability (CC) of my machine which has 8.7, whatever that means. Only installing the previous versions torch 2.8.0 and torchvision 0.23.0 do work.
I understand that torch needs to be tailored specifically for the Jetson family and that is what this page is all about, so why do I have this issue if I follow the instructions given here? Is it because I am on Jetpack 6.2.2 and here it's 6.1?
githubwalt
I forgot the warning and error output when running a python test script:
UserWarning: Found GPU0 Orin which is of compute capability (CC) 8.7.The following list shows the CCs this version of PyTorch was built for and the hardware CCs it supports:- 8.0 which supports hardware CC >=8.0,<9.0 except {8.7}- 9.0 which supports hardware CC >=9.0,<10.0
torch.AcceleratorError CUDA error: no kernel image is available for execution on the device
Glenn JocherUltralyticsThanks, that traceback helps —
CC 8.7is the AGX Orin GPU architecture, andno kernel image is availablemeans the installed PyTorch wheel was built withoutsm_87support. So yes, this is most likely a JetPack/PyTorch wheel mismatch: the native steps in the JetPack 6.1 section don’t necessarily map cleanly toJP6.2.2, even though the page includesJP6.2benchmark coverage. For now I’d stick with the workingtorch 2.8.0+torchvision 0.23.0pair or use the JetPack 6 Docker setup; if you want us to check your exact environment, please postyolo checksand the full text traceback here in the discussion.githubwalt
Thanks, will stick to 2.8 🙂 👍 (I also posted on the guide page https://docs.ultralytics.com/guides/nvidia-jetson/#what-are-the-best-practices-for-maximizing-performance-on-nvidia-jetson-when-using-yolo26 , so you could ignore that if you like, can't delete my post there 😏 )
Glenn JocherUltralyticsNo worries — the duplicate is fine, and if you later confirm a stable
JP6.2.2+ PyTorch pairing on AGX Orin, please add it here so we can reflect it in the Jetson guide.githubwalt
Will do. Now trying to get the most out of the AGX. Experimenting with number of workers on a batch size of 16. So far 12 workers gave memory issues ... I chose 12 because of 12 cores, but that was a little too much. Now running with 8 workers ... so far so good. To be continued 🙂
githubwalt
Hi Glenn, I can confirm a stable JP6.2.2 + Pytorch (torch 2.8.0 and torchvision 0.23.0) on the AGX Orin.